Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Entertainment
Mark Lawson

The Merry Wives of Windsor review – Shakespeare’s script is the weakest bit of this joyous revel

George Fouracres (Falstaff) and Katherine Pearce (Mistress Ford) in The Merry Wives of Windsor at Shakespeare’s Globe.
Woo err … George Fouracres (Falstaff) and Katherine Pearce (Mistress Ford) in The Merry Wives of Windsor at Shakespeare’s Globe. Photograph: Tristram Kenton/the Guardian

In one sense, Shakespeare’s circa-1597 love farce about duped seducers and wooers is a very modern product. It is a rapid sequel to a popular hit, even featuring, in the style of Superman and Harry Potter, the name of the marquee hero in the title: it was initially performed as Sir John Falstaff and the Merry Wives of Windsor, granting a franchise to the obese, beery, leering knight previously seen as the mentor to Henry V.

However, in another aspect, The Merry Wives of Windsor, as it now identifies, chafes against contemporary sensitivities. The main sources of comedy are fat-shaming – whether Sir John’s belly, dimensions and contents widely analysed, will fit confined spaces – and the failure of foreigners to speak and act as the Queen’s subjects did, especially the Welsh and French, nations each represented by a gross caricature. Oh, and just how many words can make an English audience see penises or vaginas.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.