Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Fortune
Fortune
Aris Alexander, Nick Lichtenberg

The AI writing debate is eerily similar to the one that rocked ancient Greece 2,700 years ago

m (Credit: Aris MESSINIS / AFP via Getty Images)

The ancient Greeks had a word for an object that is a remedy in one hand and poison in the other, depending on how it’s administered: pharmakon. Socrates used it in Plato’s Phaedrus, more than two millennia before Claude, Perplexity, or the AI-detection tool Pangram existed, to describe writing itself.

Plato recounts an Egyptian myth in which the god Theuth presents writing to King Thamus as a pharmakon — an “elixir,” or remedy, for memory (mnēmē) and wisdom (sophia). Thamus is not persuaded. Writing, he answers, will instead produce forgetfulness: by relying on external marks, people will neglect their own memory. It is, he says, a pharmakon not of mnēmē but of hypomnēsis — not memory itself, but only an aid to recollection — and one that may furnish the appearance of wisdom without genuine understanding.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.