Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
National
Duncan Murray

Sydney rampage killer's sentence cut to 40 years

Mert Ney has been re-sentenced to 40 years' jail - four years less than his initial sentence. (James Gourley/AAP PHOTOS)

A man who stabbed a sex worker to death before conducting a terrifying rampage through the streets of Sydney has had his sentence slashed by several years.

Mert Ney will be eligible for parole in October 2050 after the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal ruled on Wednesday to quash his initial sentence and impose a lesser one.

The 25-year-old was re-sentenced to 40 years' jail - four years less than his initial sentence - with a non-parole period of 30 years.

Ney met sex worker Michaela Dunn at an inner-city apartment on the morning of August 13, 2019 and immediately attacked her with a knife to the face, neck, chest and limbs, before cutting her throat.

He shared gruesome video of the attack's aftermath with a friend on Facebook, bragging about his actions.

Following the murder, he took to the streets of the city centre, shouting made-up terrorist chants and stabbing another woman, Lin Bo, in the shoulder during an attack that she survived.

Ney was apprehended by a group of bystanders, one of whom shoved him to the ground with a chair while another pinned him with a milk crate until police arrived.

During his trial, Ney pleaded guilty to murder and wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm over the attacks on Ms Dunn and Ms Bo.

In 2021, he was handed an aggregate sentence of 44 years' jail with a non-parole period of 33 years.

Ney's lawyers argued the killer's time behind bars would be more onerous on him due to his mental illness, which the appeal judges accepted was not directly addressed in the initial sentence.

Justice Robert Beech-Jones said in Wednesday's judgment he accepted expert testimony Ney's "limited intellectual functioning, high levels of anxiety, propensity towards depression, suicidal ideation and poor social skills" would make jail more difficult for him.

The original sentencing judge erred in not disclosing how those factors were considered in deciding Ney's jail term.

The appeal panel ruled a "somewhat reduced" sentence was therefore warranted.

But the judges rejected several other claims by Ney's lawyers, including that the initial sentence failed to properly consider his purported empathy and remorse for the crime.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.