The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on the immunity issue at the end of April, with a decision expected possibly in May but more likely in June, possibly extending to the end of June. This timeline is considered expedited for the Supreme Court, given the urgency surrounding the case. The public is eagerly awaiting clarity on the immunity question, emphasizing the need for a prompt resolution.
Regarding the federal election subversion case, the Department of Justice faces a crucial decision if the Supreme Court rules that Trump is not immune and a trial proceeds. The Justice Department may need to determine whether to pursue the prosecution, even if it means a trial close to the election in September or October. The decision to schedule a trial during that time frame could rest with the judge or ultimately fall to Merrick Garland.
It remains unknown if any dissenting opinions were expressed within the Supreme Court regarding the case. The Court's decision to hear the case aligns closely with the proposed schedule put forth by the special counsel, albeit slightly slower than desired. The absence of dissent in the Court's decision is not uncommon for such orders, typically issued in a concise manner.
