Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Supreme Court Rules On Presidential Immunity In Trump Case

Donald Trump Organization trial in New York State Supreme Court in New York

Former President Trump has hailed the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity as a significant victory for the Constitution and democracy. The ruling in Trump v. United States establishes that a former president enjoys substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts conducted while in office, distinguishing between official and unofficial acts.

The Supreme Court's decision, penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasizes that a president cannot be prosecuted for exercising core constitutional powers and is entitled to presumptive immunity for official acts, irrespective of political affiliations.

While the ruling may not be a complete win for Trump, he expressed satisfaction with the outcome, citing years of alleged harassment by political opponents. Trump sees the decision as a green light to resume campaigning, asserting his lead in various polls and his commitment to 'Make America Great Again.'

The case originated from Special Counsel Jack Smith's federal election interference investigation, where Trump faced charges related to the U.S. Capitol breach and alleged interference in the 2020 election results. Trump pleaded not guilty and argued for immunity from prosecution for official acts during his presidency.

Ruling distinguishes between official and unofficial acts of a president.
Former President Trump hails Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
Chief Justice John Roberts emphasizes immunity for official acts.

Smith's case against Trump has been on hold pending the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity. Following the decision, Trump took to social media to celebrate the outcome, emphasizing the significance of the ruling for the country.

The ruling sets a precedent regarding the legal boundaries of presidential immunity and its implications for former presidents. It underscores the delicate balance between accountability and immunity for actions taken while in office, leaving room for further interpretation by lower courts.

As the legal landscape evolves, the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. United States will likely have lasting implications for future presidential administrations and the scope of immunity afforded to former presidents.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.