Supreme Court Conservatives Question Medical Evidence On Gender-Affirming Care

Disney cast member Nicholas Maldonado protests his company's stance on LGBTQ issues, while participating in an employee walkout at Walt Disney World, Tuesday, March 22, 2022, in Lake Buena Vist

During a recent Supreme Court session, conservative justices raised concerns about the medical evidence supporting gender-affirming care. Justice Samuel Alito questioned the Biden administration's assertion that the benefits of such care outweigh the risks, referring to it as a 'sweeping statement.'

Alito specifically referenced Tennessee's arguments, pointing out that some European countries have scaled back gender-affirming care for minors. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar was pressed by Alito to confirm her stance on the administration's statement.

Prelogar reaffirmed her support for the statement and highlighted that a majority of medical groups endorse gender-affirming care. She also emphasized that, unlike Tennessee, other countries have not implemented a complete ban on such care.

Justice Alito questions Biden administration's stance on benefits versus risks.

Conservative justices raise concerns about medical evidence for gender-affirming care.

Tennessee's arguments and European countries' approaches are referenced in the debate.

The debate in the Supreme Court underscores the ongoing discussions surrounding gender-affirming care and the varying perspectives on its efficacy and safety. While some justices express skepticism based on international examples, others argue for the importance of considering medical consensus and individual needs.

As the legal and ethical implications of gender-affirming care continue to be debated, it remains a complex and sensitive issue that requires careful consideration of medical evidence, societal norms, and individual rights.