Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
National
Tara Cosoleto

'Landmark' greenwashing case slugs super giant $11.3m

Mercer's "Sustainable Plus" options included investments in fossil fuel production companies. (Joe Castro/AAP PHOTOS)

Australia's corporate watchdog has welcomed a $11.3 million court penalty against a superannuation giant in a "landmark" greenwashing case.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission last year launched Federal Court proceedings against Mercer Super, accusing it of engaging in greenwashing between November 2021 and March 2023. 

It alleged Mercer falsely claimed its "Sustainable Plus" investment options excluded investments in companies involved in the production or sale of alcohol, gambling and fossil fuels.

Poker machines (file image)
Mercer also included gambling businesses among its "Sustainable Plus" investments. (Darren England/AAP PHOTOS)

In reality, six of the seven investment options were connected to those industries. 

Mercer admitted the breaches in December 2023, conceding it made false or misleading statements to the public. 

The corporate watchdog and Mercer agreed to a $11.3 million fine, which the Federal Court formally confirmed on Friday morning.

Justice Christopher Horan also ordered Mercer to publish a notice on the sustainable investments page of its website detailing its admitted conduct.

The notice must remain on the website for six months, he said. 

Mercer accepted the court's decision and acknowledged the need for accurate information around investment options, a spokeswoman told AAP.

"We have co-operated with ASIC and undertaken a comprehensive review of our internal marketing processes and procedures," the company said in a statement.

"These issues were not intentional and we apologise to our members and clients."

Sarah Court (file image)
Sarah Court said ASIC will continue to look out for ESG-related claims that cannot be validated. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)

Mercer will not use members' funds to pay for the penalty, the spokeswoman said.

In his judgment, Justice Horan said greenwashing had the potential to reduce consumer confidence in environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG).

"(Greenwashing) undermines the efforts of businesses that are pursuing ESG goals accurately and fairly," the judge said.

"It is vital that consumers in the financial services industry can have confidence in ESG claims made by providers of financial products and services."

ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said it was a "landmark case" for both the watchdog and the financial services industry.

"This was ASIC's first greenwashing case brought before the Federal Court," she said.

"We will continue to monitor the market for ESG-related claims that cannot be validated by evidence to ensure the market is fair and transparent."

Greenwashing involves making false or misleading statements about the environmental benefits of a product or practice.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.