Closing summary
The longer the US-Israel war with Iran continues, the more likely it is there will be economic damage in the UK, Keir Starmer warned as governments around the world braced for major disruption to energy supplies as a result of the escalating US-Israeli war with Iran.
The prime minister insisted the economy was resilient and said the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has been speaking to the governor of the Bank of England “on a daily basis”.
He is facing scrutiny over whether the government is doing enough to prepare support packages that would help businesses and consumers in the event of sustained fuel price rises and inflationary pressures that would squeeze household budgets even further.
Starmer stressed that decisions about what is in Britain’s “best interests” are decisions for the UK prime minister alone.
Downing Street played down suggestions that a British aircraft carrier, HMS Prince of Wales, is being readied to protect Britons in the Middle East.
Finance ministers from the G7 – including the UK and US – held their conference call today to discuss the crisis, after the price of oil surged.
UK motorists were being affected by the surge in oil prices, and being encouraged to cut out non-essential car journeys to save fuel.
Thanks for joining us. We are closing this blog now. You can find all our latest coverage of UK politics here.
Updated
While anxiety intensifies over global economies, the UK is pressing ahead with measures to improve post-Brexit trade with the EU.
The UK government on Tuesday announced it will comply with EU production and marketing laws in key areas including jams, cereals, frozen food and cut flowers, to simplify post Brexit exports to the rest of Europe and try to help grow the economy.
The announcement is seen as a necessary pre-cursor to a sanitary and phytosanitary agreement ahead of the second annual UK-EU summit in July.
On Tuesday the government formally announced which EU rules it would comply with. They include rules on frozen food, food enzymes and food additives. EU rules on marketing of jams, jellies, marmalade as well as fruit juices and honey will also now apply.
“Since leaving the EU, there has been some divergence from EU legislation. However, in many cases that divergence has been minor or minimal,” said Defra, listing the areas where the UK would now follow EU law.
More than 16,000 businesses stopped exporting to the EU according to a House of Commons select committee and many of those were food producers.
Even those producing food as they did before Brexit, they were hit by a mountain of paperwork and standards and public health compliancy verification after Brexit.
HMS Prince of Wales not heading to the Middle East, Downing Street indicates
Downing Street has played down suggestions that a British aircraft carrier, HMS Prince of Wales, is being readied to protect Britons in the Middle East.
Speculation the aircraft carrier could be sent to the eastern Mediterranean grew over the weekend, after reports it has been placed on advanced readiness to sail from Portsmouth.
But the prime minister’s official spokesperson told journalists earlier:
HMS Prince of Wales has always been on very high readiness. The MoD is increasing the preparedness of the carrier, reducing the time it would take to set sail for any deployment, but there is no decision taken to deploy her.
Extra fighter jets and a warship, HMS Dragon, are already being sent to the region after drone attacks targeting UK bases.
Labour in ‘deep trouble’ with Black voters, Operation Black Vote chair warns
Labour is in “deep trouble” with Black voters, a former government adviser has warned, saying the party is at risk of being seen as “accepting the normalisation of racism”.
David Weaver, who is the chair of Operation Black Vote (OBV), said the government’s plans to restrict juries would “heighten, normalise and embed” racial disproportionality in the justice system and that Black voters were saying: “We don’t know what Labour stands for any more.”
In November, Keir Starmer vowed to “stand up to racism”. But the “moral panic” over migration and slow progress on tackling racial pay gaps and the Windrush scandal meant sentiment was low, Weaver said.
“We’re not happy,” he added. “When they’re away from power, Labour will go alongside Black communities. But the closer their proximity to power, the more they revert to type. And we had real hopes of them coming into government. You can read more here:
In a press release published on the day the Courts and Tribunals Bill was introduced in parliament (25 February), the justice secretary, David Lammy, justified the reforms by saying:
The criminal courts we inherited were on the brink of collapse, with victims waiting years for justice while the backlog spiralled out of control. For too long, victims have paid the price for a system left to crumble by those who should have acted to reform our justice system for the modern realities of crime.
Our courts reform will deliver record investment, serious reform and practical modernisation to get cases heard faster, protect jury trials for the most serious crimes, and set us on a path to turn the corner on the rising backlog by the end of this parliament. This is the only way to deliver the swift and fair justice victims deserve.
Updated
The Criminal Bar Association, which represents practising members of the Criminal Bar in England and Wales, sets out its opposition to the proposed reforms here:
The Courts and Tribunals Bill 2026 was published on the 25th of February. It is now being pushed through the parliamentary process with what can only be described as indecent haste. The second reading of the Bill in the House of Commons is on Tuesday the 10th of March. This rush to the finish line can only be for one reason – to prevent those who have a voice and wish to oppose this radical and draconian evisceration of the longstanding right to jury trial, from effectively marshalling their opposition.
We may not have a written constitution in this country, but trial by jury is a constitutional matter too important to restrict without proof of urgent necessity. A close examination of the government’s “Impact Assessment” demonstrates that such proof is lacking.
We are not reactionaries. We are in favour of a package of radical reforms. Good and laudable work to reduce the backlog has already started. For example:
more sitting days,
use of ‘Blitz’ courts to identify cases that can quickly resolve,
quicker transport of remand prisoners to court.
These are among the many measures that can make a real difference now. But this government seem unprepared and unwilling to let these remedies and efficiencies be tried first, or given time to take effect. And we know they would have effect – that can be seen from courts such as Liverpool and Preston, and circuits such as Wales and Chester. Instead, however, the government are barrelling in, so set on their plan to destroy a system that is emulated, respected and revered in countries far and wide, a system that overcomes bias and bigotry and is suited to our multicultural society, a system that works and is fair. Is this driven by an ideological antipathy to public involvement in the administration of justice? Or is it just a straightforward penny-pinching measure?
Updated
You can read more about the controversial bill and the different stages of the legislative process here.
Labour MPs reportedly join rebellion over jury trial reforms
In other news, the Times is reporting that dozens of Labour MPs are set to join a rebellion over proposals to remove the right to trial by jury in thousands of cases.
Up to 65 Labour MPs have reportedly indicated they would not support the Courts and Tribunals Bill, with most planning to abstain at the second reading tomorrow, according to the report.
Conservative and Liberal Democrats MPs are expected to oppose the bill, which contains a series of measures to tackle delays and bring down the backlog.
Some rebels will only reportedly offer their support if the justice secretary, David Lammy, agrees to compromise amendments as the bill passes through parliament.
Criticism of the government’s proposed court reforms has centred around scaling back jury trials, particularly from lawyers and some MPs.
Campaigners argue that the reforms undermine a fundamental principle of the justice system and will not work. A report from the Institute for Government (IFG) said plans to introduce judge-only criminal trials in England and Wales would save less than 2% of time in crown courts.
Updated
Oil prices have already shot up thanks to the US-Israeli war in Iran. But what is the economic fallout likely to be? Will interest rates rise? What about inflation?
Could the cost of borrowing increase – and by how much?
Pippa Crerar and Kiran Stacey discuss how the cost of living might be hit and the political implications of that…
Kemi Badenoch said she would be bringing a vote in Parliament on Tuesday to “keep fuel duty low”.
Asked whether she supported the idea of a Liz Truss-style support package to help households and businesses with a surge in oil prices, she told the Press Association on a visit to Bromley:
Well, the first thing that the prime minister should do is stop Rachel Reeves’ silly changes to fuel duty.
Last week, she had an opportunity in the spring statement to announce measures to help all of those families out there who are struggling with the cost of living.
Instead, she spent the statement telling us what a fabulous job she was doing. So tomorrow, I’m going to be bringing a vote so that we can make sure that we keep fuel duty, though, and if I would expect Labour MPs and others to support that at a time when we’re expecting serious shocks to energy prices.
Updated
Nigel Farage, the Reform party’s leader, supports regime change in Iran and said last week that Keir Starmer’s “inaction” while the US and Israel bombed the country was “frankly pathetic”.
He has called for the UK to support Trump’s war in Iran, a view that is wildly at odds with British voters, according to YouGov polling (only 29% support the joint US-Israeli strikes).
A vocal proponent of the “special relationship”, it emerged that Farage did not meet Donald Trump when he travelled to the US president’s Mar-a-Lago residence on Friday, according to a report in the FT, after suggesting he was expecting to meet with him.
Updated
No 10 would not be drawn into revealing further details of Keir Starmer’s call with Donald Trump over the weekend.
Asked about the call, the prime minister’s official spokesman said:
The prime minister was asked about this this morning. He talked about how it’s really important to emphasise that the US and the UK are working together every single day.
He also emphasised the importance of acting in the national interest for British people.
Pressed about whether Starmer and the US president spoke about the barrage of insults which Trump has launched towards him and the British government, the spokesman said:
I’m not going to go further than what you have got on the readout which we issued yesterday. The PM addressed some reactions about that this morning.
Downing Street sources have characterised the call between the two leaders as “constructive”.
Senior Labour MP Emily Thornberry, who was Keir Starmer’s shadow attorney general before the general election, has said she still backs the prime minister’s decision to not involve the UK in offensive actions on Iran (Starmer subsequently agreed to allow the US to strike Iran defensively from RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and Diego Garcia, an island in the Indian Ocean).
Speaking to Sky News, Thornberry, who is chair of parliament’s foreign affairs committee, said:
It is very, very unusual for a British prime minister to say no to an American president.
I think that the last time it happened was (Harold) Wilson, so a long time ago.
But it was right – it was right to say that we shouldn’t be involved in offensive action against Iran.
Because there wasn’t a plan, because it isn’t in Britain’s interest and because it isn’t legal. And they didn’t even try to claim it was legal …
I think it is now right that we try to protect our friends and our allies since Iran seems to be just attacking people ‘willy-nilly’.
Nigel Farage invests £215,000 in Kwasi Kwarteng’s bitcoin firm
Nigel Farage has invested in Kwasi Kwarteng’s bitcoin reserves company, as the leader of Reform UK aligns himself closer with the cryptocurrency industry.
The MP has invested £215,000 in Stack BTC, the crypto business that is chaired by the former Conservative chancellor.
Farage, who has long courted the UK’s crypto sector, said he was delighted to have “become an investor in Stack” and “lend my support to the team”.
“I have long been one of the UK’s few political advocates for bitcoin, recognising the role digital currencies will play in the future of business and finance,” he said in a statement. “I believe that we can and should be a major global hub for the crypto industry.”
It comes as Reform, which has received £12m in political donations from the crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne, strengthens its ties with the sector.
Last year it became the first main party in the UK to accept donations through bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Farage has also said he would allow people to pay their taxes with crypto and would set up a sovereign wealth fund of digital currency assets if he gained power. You can read the full story here:
This policy paper on the changing fuel duty rates says the following:
Alongside other measures announced at Budget 2025 to address the cost of living, this measure continues to support motorists by freezing the current fuel duty rates until the end of August 2026.
Rates will gradually return to March 2022 levels by March 2027, avoiding a 5 ppl increase in March 2026 when the cut was due to expire.
The planned increase in line with inflation for 2026 to 2027 is also being cancelled. This measure will save the average car driver £49 in 2026 to 2027 compared to previous plans.
Rachel Reeves is under pressure to cancel the planned increase in fuel duty due in September which will cause drivers to pay more for petrol and diesel as the government rolls back a temporary cut that was introduced four years ago.
In an interview with the Press Association, the Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch suggested she would be pushing for an extension of the 5p cut to fuel duty in parliament.
Asked about the vote she says she will put forward on Tuesday, she said:
Last week at the spring statement, Rachel Reeves said that the 5p cut on fuel duty would only last until September.
Given what we know about what is going on in the world, we should be extending that.
So tomorrow, I’m going to be bringing in a vote so that we can have a say on keeping fuel duty low as much as possible. That’s the kind of measure that will actually help people with the cost of living.
Updated
Lib Dems urge Starmer to call off King's US visit after Trump's criticism of Iran response
Lib Dems leader Ed Davey has said the planned visit by King Charles to the US next month should be cancelled after Donald Trump repeatedly insulted Britain over its response to the war on Iran.
King Charles is due to visit the US in late April to commemorate 250 years since the country’s independence.
But Davey told LBC it would be “wrong” for Keir Starmer to advise the King to put himself into an “embarrassing situation” with the visit, which comes amid a low point in UK-US relations following Trump’s criticism of Starmer over the UK’s refusal to aid the offensive strikes on Iran.
The Lib Dem leader said Trump damages the British economy with his tarrifs and said it is increasingly clear that the US president is “out of control”.
‘Donald Trump is corrupt. He’s immoral. He's out of control.’@EdwardJDavey spells out the rationale for cancelling Charles’ visit to the US. pic.twitter.com/cxxs8whxcD
— LBC (@LBC) March 9, 2026
In a post on X published yesterday, Davey said:
Given Trump’s illegal war that is devastating the Middle East and pushing up energy bills, Keir Starmer should advise the King to call off April’s state visit to the US. A state visit should not be given to someone who repeatedly insults and damages our country.
Updated
As we mentioned in the opening post, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has a call with fellow G7 finance ministers this afternoon to discuss surging oil prices and the economic impact of the US-Israeli war with Iran.
You can follow all the latest market developments in our business live blog, which is leading on how stock markets are tumbling after the oil price surged over $100 a barrel for the first time in four years:
Drivers urged to consider stopping 'non-essential' car journeys to save fuel
Drivers should consider cutting out “non-essential journeys” because fuel prices are expected to rise as the cost of oil soars, AA president Edmund King said.
King said:
The longer this conflict goes on, the more effect it will have on the cost of oil.
Any time Brent Crude passes 100 dollars per barrel raises concern across the markets, for the haulage industry and drivers.
There will be gradual increases in pump prices, but this shouldn’t happen overnight as fuel has been purchased at previous prices.
Our suggestion is that drivers should not change their refuelling habits but can consider cutting out some non-essential journeys and changing their driving style to conserve fuel.
RAC head of policy Simon Williams said:
Average petrol and diesel prices have rocketed in the last week and are unfortunately likely to keep on rising, so the situation for UK drivers is looking increasingly bleak.
Unleaded is almost certainly going to reach an average of 140p in the next week or so, while diesel looks highly likely to climb to at least 160p a litre.
We encourage drivers to continue filling up as normal but to shop around for the best prices.
Starmer said the energy cap would protect households from the impact of economic turbulence stemming from the US-Israeli war in Iran, but acknowledged that businesses – and others – would be “concerned” to carefully monitor developments.
Asked if Donald Trump was risking a world war with his military actions, the prime minister said: “We do need to find a way to de-escalate the situation and that’s what a lot of our discussions are about – how do we find a way to de-escalate this situation and make sure it doesn’t escalate even further than it already has.”
You can read a useful explainer on the price cap here:
Starmer claimed that the UK economy was in a better place than it had been in 2022 when Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy price shock. He said:
I think it is important just to remind ourselves that last time a conflict began to develop, which was 2022 in relation to Ukraine, the economy wasn’t in a stable place, and inflation was 5% and rising.
We’ve done a lot of work in the last 18 months to put some resilience in and make sure that we’ve got some headroom, which is basically some insurance within the economy, but also inflation is 3% and going down, so in that sense, there’s more resilience.
The prime minister is facing scrutiny over whether the government is doing enough to prepare support packages that would help businesses and consumers in the face of sustained fuel price rises and inflationary pressures that would squeeze household budgets.
Economists have warned that extra headroom could be wiped out by the jump in energy prices called by the escalating crisis in the Middle East, caused by the US and Israel striking Iran just over a week ago, triggering retaliatory strikes across the region.
Updated
Decisions about what is in Britain's best interests are those for the UK PM alone, Starmer says
Keir Starmer was asked by a journalist if he managed to begin to mend the so-called special relationship during his phone call with Donald Trump yesterday after the US president said last week that the British prime minister was “no Winston Churchill” following his refusal to let Washington launch initial strikes on Iran from British bases.
Starmer says the US are now using UK airbases in relation to Iran, and there is still close intelligence cooperation and contact between counterparts in London and Washington on a daily basis “at all levels”.
“In the region, we have our military personnel and US military personnel co-located in the same places, in the same bases,” he said.
“Both the US and UK are working together, protecting those bases. So in terms of the relationship the work that we necessarily have to do together is going on as you would expect.”
Starmer said decisions about what is in Britain’s “best interests” are decisions for the UK prime minister alone. He stresses that this is a “fundamental principle” that has guided his decision making on Iran.
His language echoes comments by the foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper, who told the BBC yesterday that the government’s job is not to be “outsourcing our foreign policy”.
Cooper’s remarks were made after the former Labour prime minister, Tony Blair, told a private lunch event on Friday that Starmer “should have backed America from the very beginning” and let the Trump administration use British airbases.
Updated
The longer Iran war goes on, the more likely the impact on our economy, Starmer says
Addressing the war in Iran, Keir Starmer acknowledged that the longer the conflict went on the greater the likely impact on the UK’s economy. The prime minister said:
The job of government is obviously to get ahead, to look around the corner, to work with others, and the chancellor speaks to the governor of the Bank of England on a daily basis, with looking cross-departmental within government, assessing the risks, monitoring and talking to our international partners as well about what more we can do together to reduce the likely impact on people here and businesses here, of course.
But it is important to acknowledge that that work is needed, because people will sense, you will sense I think, that the longer this goes on, the more likely the potential for an impact on our economy, impact into the lives and households of everybody and every business.
And our job is to get ahead of that, to look around the corner, assess the risk, monitor the risks, and work with others in relation to that.
Keir Starmer is answering questions from members of the public in a community centre in London. He is asked what he is trying to do to bring communities together at such a divided time.
“It is a really sad feature – isn’t it – at a time that this that some people will try to use it as an opportunity to divide,” the prime minister said.
“We have to be really conscious that where people want to divide at the moment in relation to this conflict it’s in the space of trying to divide the Muslim community and the Jewish community so we are working particularly on those two strands.”
Starmer says one of his “biggest concerns” is that there are too many politicians who want to “set up grievances between different groups of people”, something he says he fundamentally rejects as he praises the diversity of the country.
Starmer has been accused of pandering to the populist right in a failed attempt to attract Reform voters through harsh rhetoric on migration in particular.
Updated
The communities secretary, Steve Reed, has acknowledged the scale of economic uncertainty caused by the US-Israel war with Iran but said the British economy was resilient enough to withstand any shocks.
Speaking to ITV’s Good Morning Britain, he said:
Of course, the UK can’t control things that happen, crises that happen across the planet, that have an impact on us here at home. What we can control are our own circumstances.
Now, when it comes to the cost of oil, and we’ve seen what’s happened overnight, we’re still only just over a week into this conflict, we don’t know how long it will go on, we don’t know what the long-term impact will be on energy prices.
But, as I say, the fact that we have a more stable economy means we’re in a better position to weather those storms, and we will, of course, keep a very close eye as we monitor the situation.
As the Guardian’s economics editor, Heather Stewart, notes in this story, Rachel Reeves said last week that the unstable global situation meant the actions she had taken on inflation, including shifting green levies to general taxation and freezing bus fares and prescription charges, were “even more crucial”.
The chancellor will be under pressure to provide a package of help for small businesses if the war causes a sustained energy price crisis.
Here is some detail on reports that G7 finance ministers are preparing to discuss the release of emergency oil reserves, courtesy of Guardian business reporter Lauren Almeida:
The emergency meeting would take place at 8.30am New York time to discuss the impact of the Iran war, the FT reported, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter.
Three G7 countries, including the US, have so far reportedly expressed support for the release of the emergency reserves, which are held by the IEA’s 32 member countries across the globe.
The IEA holds strategic reserves of petroleum as part of an emergency system designed to help countries withstand oil price crises. US officials believe a joint release in the range of 300m to 400m barrels would be appropriate, which would reportedly represent 25% to 35% of the 1.2bn barrels in reserve.
The UK month-ahead gas price jumped by 19% to 163p a therm on Monday morning. The continental European month-ahead benchmark is up 16% at €62 a megawatt hour.
Oil prices rose and stock markets in Asia, the UK and mainland Europe fell on Monday morning after continued violence in the Middle East fed investor concerns around a supply crunch, pushing Brent crude to its highest level in four years and triggering a stock market sell-off. You can read the full story here:
Starmer seeks to reassure public over cost of living as oil prices surge from US-Israeli war with Iran
Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of UK politics as governments around the world brace for major disruption to energy supplies as a result of the escalating US-Israeli war with Iran.
Keir Starmer is expected to promise to protect the British public from the economic impact of the war after oil prices surged past $100 a barrel for the first time since 2022.
“No matter the headwinds, supporting working people and their families with the cost of living is always top of my mind,” the prime minister said ahead of a visit on Monday to a community centre in London.
Starmer added:
People are also rightly worrying what this means for life at home – their bills, their jobs, their communities.
I want to address those concerns head on. I will always be guided by what is best for the British public. And no matter the headwinds, supporting working people and their families with the cost of living is always top of my mind.
Starmer is reportedly under pressure from unions and his backbenchers to prepare a support package to help people already grappling with a cost of living crisis in case of a prolonged conflict.
Most UK households will be protected from the impact of rising energy prices in the short term by the energy price cap, but the UK’s reliance on gas from the Middle East makes it especially vulnerable to an effective blockade of the strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world’s liquid natural gas is transported.
Rising oil prices will feed through to higher costs at petrol stations, and consumers will be hit if energy costs push up inflation.
In an emergency meeting later today, G7 finance ministers will discuss a potential joint release of petroleum from reserves coordinated by the International Energy Agency, according to a report in the Financial Times.
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is expected to be among the finance ministers to attend the virtual meeting convened to address the crisis.
