Early evening summary
Downing Street has said Keir Starmer expects Rachel Reeves to remain as chancellor until the next election. The PM’s spokesperson said this to lobby journalists this afternoon after Starmer refused to say she would definitely stay in post for the whole parliament at a Q&A earlier. It is normal for prime ministers to avoid commitments of this kind, but the Starmer answer led to the Tories claiming that Reeves’ future was at risk. (See 1.11pm.) In truth, although Reeves’ budget is being blamed for helping to suppress growth, there seems to be no immediate likelihood of her being moved – and assurances for the medium or long term are relatively meaningless.
Starmer has given a speech stressing what he sees as the enormous potential benefits of artificial intelligence (AI). (See 12.51pm.) He was promoting the government’s AI opportunities action plan published today. Dan Milmo has a summary of its main points.
Unions and the consumer group Which? have said the government should be doing more to address the potential downsides of AI.
Updated
Sacking Reeves now would be 'disastrous' for government, says former Tory chancellor Ken Clarke
Sacking Rachel Reeves now would be ‘disastrous’ for the government, according to Ken Clarke, the former Tory chancellor.
In an interview with Radio 4’s PM programme, Clarke said that he was disappointed by Reeves’ first budget because she raised taxes so much for business. But he also said being chancellor involved taking unpopular decisions. He told the programme:
Everybody knows what we’re trying to do, which is to make this country an attractive place for business investment again …
I think if Keir Starmer were to sack Rachel Reeves in the present time, it would demonstrate Keir Starmer has even less political nous and skill than I have.
For him to sack his chancellor within six months because she’s actually taken controversial steps with his approval would, I think, be disastrous for the government.