During a recent hearing, Rep. Nathaniel Moran questioned Special Counsel Robert Hur regarding his investigation into the competency and mental capacity of President Biden. Moran commended Hur for his thorough and independent investigation, which involved interviewing approximately 150 witnesses and examining millions of documents.
One of the key findings highlighted by Moran was Hur's conclusion that President Biden's memory was significantly limited, leading to potential concerns about his fitness for office. Moran drew parallels between Hur's findings and the definition of an incapacitated individual under the guardianship statute in Washington, D.C., suggesting that Biden's memory issues could warrant the appointment of a guardian.
Referencing his experience overseeing guardianships in Texas, Moran expressed alarm at the implications of Hur's conclusions and raised questions about Biden's ability to manage national resources given his reported memory lapses.
Despite Hur's lack of familiarity with the D.C. guardianship statute, Moran pointed out the striking similarities between the statute's definition of incapacity and Hur's observations of Biden's memory limitations and diminished faculties.
Ultimately, Moran emphasized the significance of Hur's report in raising concerns about President Biden's fitness for office, both currently and in the future. He commended Hur for his diligent and detailed investigation, acknowledging the gravity of the issues raised in the report.
By addressing these critical issues, Moran underscored the importance of ensuring that the President is capable of fulfilling his duties effectively. The hearing shed light on the complexities surrounding Biden's mental capacity and raised important questions about his ability to govern.
