Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Simon Jenkins

Sanctions don’t result in regime change. Whether against Iran or Russia, western countries need shrewder tactics

An Iranian national flag in the rubble of a collapsed building following strikes at Sharif University of Technology in Tehran on 7 April 2026.
An Iranian national flag in the rubble of a collapsed building following strikes at Sharif University of Technology in Tehran on 7 April 2026. Photograph: Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty Images

The chancellor of the exchequer and the IMF agree. Britain’s economy is about to take its greatest hit for decades. This is collateral damage from the US’s war on Iran and the closing of the strait of Hormuz – and will be made worse by sanctioning Gulf oil exports. Britain has already been weakened by four years of sanctions against Russia over Ukraine. Now its economic growth is to be crushed, its government’s popularity is plummeting and its prime minister may face removal.

This was what sanctions were supposed to do to the enemy, not to the UK. Their unprecedented severity was to teach Vladimir Putin the error of his ways. His friends were to plead with him to stop. Yet, in the years after sanctions took hold, Russia’s rate of economic growth was higher than Britain’s. Meanwhile, sanctions against Iran in the 2010s were meant to halt its nuclear programme. They appeared to encourage it. Now they are meant to undermine the Tehran regime and topple the ayatollahs. There seems to be little chance of that.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.