Robert Kennedy Jr. recently took to Twitter to express his frustration at being excluded from a debate, claiming that he is being sidelined because his opponents fear he could win. He argued that keeping viable candidates off the debate stage undermines democracy.
However, a response to Kennedy's statement highlighted the importance of focusing on candidates with a realistic chance of securing the necessary 270 electoral votes to become the President of the United States. The response emphasized that, in the current political landscape, only Joe Biden and Donald Trump are seen as viable contenders for the presidency.
The responder stressed the significance of not wasting time in front of the American people by including individuals who are deemed to have no realistic chance of winning the election. They emphasized that, given the critical issues at stake and the importance of democracy, it is essential for the public to hear from the two main candidates who are in a position to potentially lead the country.
With the upcoming election looming large, the focus on candidates who have a genuine shot at winning the presidency becomes increasingly crucial. The argument put forth suggests that limiting the debate stage to candidates with a viable path to victory is essential for providing voters with a clear understanding of the choices before them.
As the political discourse intensifies and the race for the presidency heats up, the exclusion of candidates who are not seen as viable contenders raises questions about the democratic process and the need for a focused and informative debate platform. The call to prioritize the voices of candidates with a realistic chance of success underscores the gravity of the decision that lies ahead for the American electorate.
