Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Peter Hain

Rishi Sunak’s government would ban the very boycotts that helped to end apartheid

African National Congress leader Nelson Mandela is greeted by British prime minister Margaret Thatcher at 10 Downing Street on 4 July, 1990.
‘The anti-apartheid movement had few friends in government in the 1980s, with Thatcher infamously labelling Mandela’s ANC as ‘terrorists’.’ Photograph: Russell Boyce/Reuters

Historic change was brought about in my home country thanks in no small part to the anti-apartheid protests and campaigns around the world. By boycotting sports, and goods such as wine and oranges, the world put pressure on South Africa that led to the end of the brutal apartheid regime. Now, the UK government is trying to force through an authoritarian piece of legislation that would outlaw similar boycotts – actions that are a vital form of democratic protest. That is, unless my fellow peers stand with me in opposing this bill in the House of Lords.

The economic activity of public bodies (overseas matters) bill, better known as the “anti-boycott bill”, is attempting to pick up where Margaret Thatcher’s government left off: banning public bodies from boycotting goods and businesses they believe are conducting problematic activity overseas. The bill is explicit in its focus on Israel, but history shows us that it would also have far-reaching and dangerous consequences for free speech and for human rights too.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.