Early evening summary
Government defeated in Lords as peers insist on stricter definition of what counts as disruption in public order bill
In the House of Lords peers have started voting on the public order bill. Amnesty International UK describes it as “deeply draconian” and there are a series of amendments down at report stage which would make it significantly less draconian.
In the first vote, peers backed a Labour amendment, with cross-party support, designed to raise the threshold for what counts as serious disruption. The bill as drafted by the government is designed to lower the threshold, so as to make it easier for the police to arrest protesters.
The amendment was passed by 243 votes to 221 – a majority of 22.
Moving the amendment, Labour’s Lord Coaker said that without change, the bill would outlaw protests “that all of us would regard as reasonable, all of us would regard as acceptable”.
This is from the pressure group Liberty.
No it won't because...
— Liberty (@libertyhq) January 30, 2023
BREAKING
The House of Lords has binned Gov's attempts to lower the threshold of 'serious' disruption to make it easier to criminalise people who stand up for causes they believe in#PublicOrderBill https://t.co/QIuUkDOAqY
Updated