Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Staff Reporter

‘Riots accused using names to deflect blame’

  (Source: Sudhakara Jain)

Opposing the bail application of former JNU student leader Umar Khalid in the Delhi riots “larger conspiracy” case, the prosecution on Wednesday told a city court that the accused persons had “pinned the blame” of the riots on BJP leader Kapil Mishra and the Bhim Army in order to deflect their own involvement in the case.

Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad made the argument before Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat, who had clubbed the bail pleas of several other accused, including Mr. Khalid, in the case.

Mr. Prasad submitted the Delhi Protest Support Group (DPSG), constituted to coordinate various protests against CAA and NRC, tried to deflect its culpability in the riots by blaming Mr. Mishra’s speech and the Bhim Army, which called for a Bharat Bandh days before the riots.

“...On one side we have seen you say that after a [bandh] call by Bhim Army, there is an escalation [in movement]. Then a complaint against Kapil Mishra…the first front is Bhim Army and the second front you are opening against Kapil Mishra…,” SPP Prasad argued.

The prosecution also submitted that there was no participation of local residents in the anti-CAA and NRC protests. “When no local women are there, what is the option? Importing from somewhere…”

The SPP said the meetings conducted by the DPSG on February 16 and 17 pertained to the “collection of acid”, as stated by a protected witness before a magistrate.

“If you are doing peaceful protests, then why are you stocking up on acid? The purpose was to create violence,” said Mr. Prasad.

Reiterating that it was a “conspiracy of silence”, he told the court that there were a total of 34 messages in the group between February 18 and 21. “...as soon as the violence began, there was absolute silence in the group, limiting the interaction to sharing messages and forwards,” the court was informed.

CCTV footage

Mr. Prasad also played out CCTV footage of the protest sites to buttress his argument that several cameras installed there were diverted, covered or disconnected to ensure that no evidence was left.

Citing an alleged statement of Mr. Khalid that “blood had to be shed”, Mr. Prasad asked, “You are not shedding your own blood. Whose blood are you shedding?”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.