The United States has carried out retaliatory airstrikes in Syria and Iraq in response to a recent drone attack that resulted in the death of three American soldiers in Jordan. The Trump administration has stated that while these strikes have been launched, they have ruled out any direct military action against Iran.
Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, expressed his thoughts on the situation. He emphasized the importance of maintaining a strong stance against Iran, stating that they only respond to strength and would continue to pose a threat if weakness was shown. Mullen highlighted the numerous attacks by Iranian proxy terrorist organizations, over 160 since October, and the need for a swift and immediate response to deter further aggression.
While Mullen advocated for firm action, he also acknowledged the challenges of initiating direct force against Iran. He suggested responding quickly to any attacks while simultaneously reinstating sanctions on Iran. Mullen emphasized the importance of demonstrating strength and earning respect from adversaries in the Middle East.
The discussion then shifted to the issue of border security, with Mullen expressing concerns about the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border. He criticized the current administration's approach, claiming that an open border poses a national security risk. Mullen acknowledged the possibility of having to lower expectations regarding border legislation due to the lack of control over the White House and the Senate.
However, he outlined three main goals for addressing the issue: stemming the flow of illegal immigrants, reforming the asylum process, and changing the parole system. Mullen cited the need for a stronger burden of proof for asylum claims and emphasized that individuals entering Mexico to reach the United States should be required to seek asylum in Mexico.
The senator acknowledged the criticisms surrounding an upcoming border bill but urged lawmakers to read and evaluate the legislation before making a final decision. He argued that a thorough examination of the bill is essential, as voting without proper understanding does not serve the best interests of the country.
In conclusion, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen emphasized the importance of responding with strength to deter Iranian aggression while also addressing the challenges at the U.S.-Mexico border. He called for a careful assessment of future border legislation to ensure that it aligns with national security interests and effectively manages immigration issues.
