Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Fortune
Fortune
David Meyer

Psychological warfare’: TikTokers are right to be horrified by the new Bold Glamour filter

(Credit: Philippe Lopez—AFP/Getty Images)

This week has seen an outpouring of horror at a new TikTok filter called “Bold Glamour”—or, as artist and researcher Memo Akten defines it, “psychological warfare and pure evil.” 

Bold Glamour is a beauty filter, but not as you know them. It doesn’t just map a new, conventionally attractive face over the user’s human visage; it does so in a way that remains realistic even when the user, for example, puts a hand over half their face—a move that would flummox earlier iterations of such technology. Yes, there’s still an artificial sheen to the results, but it looks real enough to provoke visceral reactions.

“This is not healthy,” says TikToker Meghan Lane in a popular video with the filter transforming her face. “My insecurity is about to skyrocket. My confidence is about to go way down.” When she turns off the filter, she winces. “I have never felt uglier,” says TikToker Lindsay Borow in another video, when she switches back to reality.

Social media has been messing with young people’s self-perception for many years now. When the American Psychological Association last week published a study showing that “reducing social media use improves appearance and weight esteem in youth with emotional distress,” the results were unsurprising. But the last few years have been especially rough—an educator friend recently told me how worried she was about many teenage girls in her school, who spent much of the pandemic interacting online with their peers and are now struggling to adapt to unfiltered-face-to-unfiltered-face life.

In this context, I think it’s fair to say there’s “psychological warfare” at play here, certainly at the cultural level. TikTok may have just announced a one-hour default daily time limit for its use by teenagers, but filters like Bold Glamour betray a deeper irresponsibility. 

Should we even call this a “filter” anymore? In a recent video, the writer and TikToker Sophia Smith Galer argues that “effect,” the term that TikTok itself employs, is more appropriate. “Why are we still using this word that comes from the old school days of Instagram?” she asks, when using the tool is really “a significant altering of an image, more like what we see in cinema.”

For me, this brings to mind the ubiquitous musical effect known as autotune. Vocalists can use it in a way that screams “I’m using autotune!”—think Grimes, or Bad Bunny, or Cher’s “Believe,” which introduced the tool to the world a quarter of a century ago. Sometimes, as with T-Pain, they’ll build a career on the sound of the effect while actually being a decent-enough singer to not need it.

But, alongside those using autotune to explore new sounds and stand out, there are many more singers who use it as a crutch to iron out the perceived imperfections in their voices and performances, often without most listeners noticing. Those audiences have become accustomed to hearing “perfect” pitch, and the artists have accordingly become locked into delivering it, often thinking their natural voices are not good enough to present on their own.

The result is that it’s become increasingly difficult to tell singers apart because distinctiveness and creativity so often stem from “imperfection”—the YouTube music guru Rick Beato even argues, quite persuasively, that the pop industry has set itself up for an A.I. takeover through its embrace of autotune. When you feel obliged to use technology to keep up with societal expectations, the results can be self-defeating and, well, boring.

Perhaps there will be a cultural backlash against autotune one day, and perhaps the appalled reactions to Bold Glamour will accelerate a revolution against digital masks. But, especially for those at a young age that has always been associated with pressure to conform, the pull of TikTok’s latest effect could prove irresistible, and its absence crushing. If the metaverse does become a thing, it will only amplify such risks, making now the time to have a wide discussion about the faces we choose to show the world.

Want to send thoughts or suggestions to Data Sheet? Drop a line here.

David Meyer

Data Sheet’s daily news section was written and curated by Andrea Guzman. 

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.