Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Prosecutors Yet To Tie Wrongdoing To Former President Trump

Former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump campaigns in Clinton trump presidential candidate campaign

Criminal defense attorney Bill Brennan, who has represented Donald Trump in the past, recently shared his insights on the ongoing trial involving key figures like Michael Cohen, David Pecker, and Keith Davidson. Brennan emphasized that despite the sensational testimonies presented thus far, prosecutors have yet to establish a direct link to the former president.

According to Brennan, the trial has been filled with what he described as 'salacious conversations and sleazy deals' involving individuals known for their controversial backgrounds. He specifically mentioned Michael Cohen as a disbarred lawyer known for his role as a fixer, David Pecker as the publisher of a tabloid publication, and Keith Davidson as a lawyer specializing in non-disclosure agreements.

While acknowledging the dramatic nature of the testimonies, Brennan highlighted the importance of connecting the presented evidence to the defendant in question. He likened the trial proceedings to a soap opera, suggesting that the jury has been exposed to a series of intriguing but disconnected narratives.

Trial features 'salacious conversations and sleazy deals' involving controversial figures.
Bill Brennan emphasizes lack of direct link to former president in ongoing trial.
Michael Cohen, David Pecker, and Keith Davidson are central to the trial proceedings.

As the trial unfolds, Brennan emphasized the necessity for the prosecution to establish a clear and direct link between the testimonies and the alleged wrongdoing attributed to the former president. He stressed that without this crucial connection, the case may lack the substantive evidence required to implicate the defendant.

Overall, Brennan's assessment of the trial underscores the significance of establishing a coherent narrative that directly implicates the accused party. As the legal proceedings continue, the prosecution faces the challenge of bridging the gap between the testimonies presented and the involvement of the former president, a task that will likely shape the outcome of the trial.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.