Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
Jamie Grierson

No one who has admitted phone hacking has said Prince Harry was among victims, says Mirror Group – as it happened

Prince Harry is one of more than 100 claimants in the lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers.
Prince Harry is one of more than 100 claimants in the lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers. Photograph: Hannah McKay/Reuters

Closing summary

Today’s proceedings in the high court are coming to a close. The day has focused upon the claims made by the Duke of Sussex. Here’s a summary of what happened today:

  • Prince Harry did not arrive in court in person – to the annoyance of the presiding judge.

  • The duke’s barrister, David Sherborne, told the court Harry had left Los Angeles the previous evening because he had been celebrating his daughter’s birthday.

  • Mr Justice Fancourt said he was “a little surprised” to hear the duke would not be attending court on Monday. The judge said he gave a direction earlier in the trial that witnesses should be available the day before their evidence was due to be heard in case the legal teams’ opening speeches ran short.

  • Sherborne outlined some of the details of Harry’s claim, including Mirror Group articles that were submitted as evidence of unlawful information gathering, such as phone hacking.

  • Harry was subjected to the interception of voicemails, the use of a large number of private investigators to obtain information about him and the various aspects of his personal life, as well as “blagging” billing data and other private information.

  • The claim covers three periods, Sherborne says, from 1996 to 1999, from 1999 to 2006, and then from 2007 to 2011.

  • Sherborne told the court Diana, Princess of Wales was a “huge target” for MGN’s newspapers, adding that certain unlawful activities in relation to her would have also affected Harry.

  • Under Piers Morgan’s leadership, Daily Mirror reporters allegedly hacked the phone of Diana, Princess of Wales, Sherborne told the court.

  • Andrew Green KC said there was no evidence that hacking of Harry’s phone took place. “Zilch, zero, nil, de nada, niente, nothing,” he said.

Thanks for reading.

Updated

The proceedings have concluded for the day – but will continue tomorrow with Prince Harry in the witness box.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.