A London judge ruled on Wednesday that Prince Harry was not improperly stripped of his publicly funded security detail during visits to Britain after he gave up his status as a working member of the royal family and moved to the U.S. Justice Peter Lane of the High Court stated that the decision to provide security to Harry on a case-by-case basis was deemed lawful, rational, and justified.
The Duke of Sussex had expressed concerns about his safety and that of his family while visiting the U.K., citing hostility on social media and relentless media attention. His lawyer argued that the government group responsible for evaluating Harry's security needs had acted irrationally and failed to adhere to its own policies.
