Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
Jamie Grierson

Prince Harry appears to fight back tears and says press intrusion has been ‘a lot’ during evidence in Mirror Group hacking trial – as it happened

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, arrives at court on Wednesday.
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, arrives at court on Wednesday. Photograph: Sean Smith/The Guardian

Closing summary

The litigation against Mirror Group Newspapers has concluded for the day with Prince Harry finishing his evidence and former royal editor for the Mirror, Jane Kerr, starting hers.

The Duke of Sussex fought back tears late in the session as his barrister David Sherborne reflected on the damage caused by press intrusion.

Here’s a round up of the day’s key events:

  • Harry told the court he would feel “some injustice” if his claim against MGN is unsuccessful. He says phone hacking has been done on an “industrial scale” across at least three of the papers – and says any decision with his claim, he would “feel some injustice if it wasn’t accepted”.

  • The Mirror Group, represented by Andrew Green, said there was not a single item of evidence to show phone hacking.

  • Harry says it was “hurtful” to read stories that appeared gleeful about his break up with Chelsy Davy.

  • Harry told the court he believes articles about his relationship with Caroline Flack, the late television presenter, were obtained by phone hacking.

  • Harry denied his claims were in the “realms of speculation” as the Mirror barrister alleges, adding the Mirror has evidence of illegal information gathering, such as invoices for private investigators, in front of it.

  • Harry’s barrister read an email from Mirror journalist Katie Hind which describes how to hack phones.

  • The prince told the court that he once found a “tracking device” on a car belonging to Chelsy Davy, his ex-girlfriend.

  • The court heard Mirror journalist Jane Kerr attempted to get out of giving evidence last week, only to be forced to attend the trial by the judge.

  • In her witness statement, Kerr said she did not know how a private investigator obtained phone numbers “and never asked how”. She has denied obtaining information unlawfully.

Thanks for reading.

The court session has concluded for the day.

The judge, Mr Justice Fancourt, has warned Jane Kerr to not discuss her evidence with anyone before returning to court.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.