Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
Comment
Andrew Arthur

POINT: Privately run immigration detention is a safe and cost-effective alternative

On his campaign website, then-candidate Joe Biden vowed to “end for-profit detention centers,” asserting tendentiously that “no business should profit from the suffering of desperate people fleeing violence.”

“For-profit” in this context is a pejorative used to describe privately run detention facilities, and such assertions elide many key facts — including that federal law requires certain migrants be detained and that these private facilities must comply with the same detention standards that federal facilities are expected to meet and do so in a cost-effective manner — in substituting base emotion for reason.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is the cornerstone of our nation’s immigration laws. It mandates — in no uncertain terms — that migrants who are stopped entering the United States illegally or without proper documents are subject to detention from the moment they are encountered until they are either granted immigration relief or removed.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.