This week, experts are convening in Bangkok to advance the first international treaty aimed at addressing the escalating issue of plastic pollution. The final negotiations for the treaty are scheduled to take place in South Korea in November.
However, concerns have been raised as many key stakeholders, including environmentalists, tribal leaders, and community members affected by plastic production and waste, have been excluded from the talks in Bangkok. Similarly, representatives from the plastic industry have also reported difficulties in gaining access to the discussions.
Several organizations have criticized the lack of transparency and public participation in the negotiations, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity in international environmental treaty-making processes. The closure of the talks in Bangkok has raised concerns about setting a negative precedent for future treaty negotiations.
While the United Nations Environment Programme has defended the limited participation, stating that only member states and selected technical experts are allowed as participants, critics argue that observers play a crucial role in environmental treaties.
The current meeting in Bangkok marks a significant step as it focuses on discussing the substantive aspects of the potential treaty. The discussions are set to continue for the next week, with the final session scheduled to take place in South Korea.
Despite the restrictions on participation, some countries have included representatives from industry associations and national oil companies in their delegations. Efforts have been made to include environmentalists, scientists, waste pickers, and tribal leaders in national delegations, with varying degrees of success.
Advocates for a robust treaty that addresses plastic production, toxic chemicals in plastics, and plastic waste have expressed concerns that the limited participation in the Bangkok talks could lead to a weaker final document. The importance of diverse perspectives and stakeholder engagement in shaping effective solutions to plastic pollution has been underscored by various groups.
As the negotiations progress, the debate over public participation and the need for a comprehensive and impactful treaty on plastic pollution continues to be a focal point of discussion among stakeholders and experts.
