Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Eugene Volokh

"Plaintiff Was Enticed by an Attractive, Busty Jewess, and Wet His Mouth with a Drink of Partially Unknown Provenance"

That's from plaintiff's follow-up arguments for pseudonymity filed Saturday in Doe v. Trustees of Univ. of Pa. (E.D. Pa.). Judging by the address listed in the filings, as well as the rhetoric (e.g., "The Jews are a racial supremacist organization whose stated goal is to exterminate and enslave all non-Jews"), this seems to be the same John Doe who was denied pseudonymity in a case I wrote about in February, see No Pseudonymity for Man Suing Harvard Alleging Jews Aim "to Exterminate or Enslave All Non-Jews".

I expect the same ruling on pseudonymity in this case as in that one (despite the addition of the busty Jewess, who did not seem present in that case); to quote Judge Allison Burroughs' decision in that case, Doe v. President & Fellows of Harvard College:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.