A lack of action and overtaking in last weekend’s Monte Carlo race, where the top ten drivers finished in the same position they started, has triggered calls for potential rule changes to help spice it up.
Perhaps the most sensible idea has come from Mercedes driver George Russell, who reckoned that bringing only soft tyres to Monaco – rather than the usual three different compounds – would serve to add some jeopardy.
PLUS: The tools F1 has to fix its racing problems without using a sledgehammer
Pirelli’s head of car racing and F1 Mario Isola said he would be happy to get teams to provide some simulation data on how such a soft-tyre-only race would play out, but he is not convinced it will change things dramatically as it will force even greater tyre conservation.
“I’ve heard the proposal and I spoke to George actually, who told me about it,” said Isola. “I believe that we can ask the teams to make a simulation and see what happens.
“But in 2018 when they were running softer tyres, if I remember well, they were running eight seconds slower than the potential of the tyres – which was F2 pace.”
Isola said that delivering softer tyres for Monaco would not necessarily force extra pitstops and instead would likely just make drivers back off even more to keep their rubber alive.
“The problem in Monaco is that you cannot overtake, so you can slow down by 2/3/4 seconds per lap and nobody can get past you,” he noted.
“What is important, in my opinion, is that we have to consider not just the tyres, but why a team decides to stop or not.
“It is a combination of tyre degradation, how easy it is to overtake and the time you spend in a pit stop. Imola is a good example, because if you take 28 seconds for an additional pit stop, you try to not take it.”
Isola said suggestions of mandating a minimum number of pitstops would also not bring any added value, because teams would likely then lock into the same strategies.
“I remember that many years ago, when there was this proposal [to force two stops], we had the discussion and the teams asked their strategy engineers to make a simulation,” he explained.
“The result was that everyone came back with more or less the same strategy. So by adding constraints, we are not pushing them to have different strategies or different approaches to the race, but just to converge to the same one. And this is not what we want.
“What we want is to have a mix of one stop and two stops, with different compounds used.
“To fix the issue we need to work together to sit down, consider all the proposals, make a simulation, and understand which is the best approach.”
Asked what he reckoned the best solution would be for Monaco, Isola said: “A wider circuit - but you cannot destroy buildings in Monaco.
PLUS: Can Monaco stay on the F1 calendar post-2025?
“It is a unique race where basically everything is decided on Saturday with qualifying, unless there is something unpredictable or strange.
“But for the rest of the street circuits, if we go softer, maybe we can change a little bit the approach and open a two-stop strategy where we have one.
“I'm thinking about the other street circuits like Miami and Las Vegas, the new ones. That is possible. But for Monaco, to be honest, I believe that there is very little we can do.”
Isola added that Pirelli had now all but signed off on the construction of next year’s new slick tyres, which are aimed at reducing overheating, following a test at Paul Ricard this week.
There will also be an extra softer compound added to the selection, which will be aimed specifically for street circuits.
“The idea is also to introduce a new C6 compound, a softer one, because in the calendar we have more and more street circuits and we need softer compounds,” he revealed.
“We are going to move the range a little bit on the soft side, and always trying to reduce the overheating.”
