Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Business

Pension age changes have cost me dearly

Woman working at a desk
‘I never received any direct communication from the Department for Work and Pensions telling me that I would have to work on to age 66.’ Photograph: Shutterstock

I am one of the thousands of women who have lost out through pension age changes (Thousands of UK women owed pension payout after ombudsman’s Waspi ruling, 21 March). Contrary to what the government claims, I never received any direct communication from the Department for Work and Pensions telling me that I would have to work on to age 66, instead of being able to retire at 60, as I had assumed. I found out through news reports instead.

The costs to those of us affected are not just monetary. Had I been able to retire at 60, instead of 66, I would have been able to spend more time caring for my father before he died with dementia in 2018. And I might not have suffered a heart attack last year aged 67, just eight months after retiring (two‑plus years working from home in a sedentary job during Covid probably did nothing for my heart health).

While I recognise that pension ages needed to be equalised, successive Tory governments since 2011 have shown a contemptuous attitude to women in their mishandling of the issue.
Gill Roberts
Bishopston, Swansea

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.