Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
Scott Bailey

No agenda in 'line-ball call' to leave Bancroft out

Despite plenty of runs in domestic cricket Cameron Bancroft has been overlooked for a Test spot. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)

George Bailey has rejected any suggestion Cameron Bancroft's Test absence is political, telling the opener the ball-tampering scandal is completely in the past.

The Sheffield Shield's leading run-scorer for the past two seasons, Bancroft was told on Tuesday he'd missed out in the race to replace David Warner.

With Steve Smith to open and Cameron Green returning to the side at No.4, Bancroft then had the added blow of seeing Matt Renshaw picked ahead of him as a back-up batsman and current next in line if Smith or Usman Khawaja retire.

Bancroft's non-selection is a contentious one on many fronts.

The likes of Ricky Ponting and Justin Langer had called for Australia to go with a specialist opener to replace Warner, a fact selectors do not believe to be crucial.

The man at the centre of sandpaper-gate, Bancroft returned from his nine-month ban to open for Australia in the 2019 Ashes before being dropped after two Tests.

He created headlines again in 2021 when he responded that it was "self explanatory" when asked if the bowlers were aware the ball was being tampered with at Cape Town in 2018.

Former Test allrounder Tom Moody has been among those to question the non-selection, and whether there was an "agenda" in the call.

Selection is never an easy task but the oversight of Cameron Bancroft is shocking.
His first class numbers are so compelling against his peers it feels there is another agenda which I hope was communicated to him honestly! #Bancroft

— Tom Moody (@TomMoodyCricket) January 9, 2024

But despite that, chief selector Bailey was adamant that there had been no push from the bowlers to not have Bancroft selected.

"Categorically no. And I've shared this with Cameron on a number of occasions," he said.

"It has never at any stage been discussed from the panel's perspective. It's purely a cricketing decision. 

"There's not a member of the team that would have an issue with Cam playing. We certainly don't have an issue with it. 

"A lot of people tend to forget the fact that Cam has actually played Test cricket since returning from the ban. It was a long time ago.

"We've all moved well past that. I'd be disappointed if that's people were looking to that as a reason. That's that's not the case. Never has been and never will be."

Bancroft's manager Ben Tippett said on SEN on Wednesday that the opener was "really upset and disappointed" when told the news and "might be a bit angry" one day on from the call.

Bailey said his panel had to look at more than just Sheffield Shield runs when selecting the squad, with Renshaw having impressed for Australia A and Prime Minister's XI.

The chief selector also insisted the line was not through on Bancroft or long-term back-up batsman Marcus Harris, both aged 31 and four years older than Renshaw. 

"You can mount statistically some strong cases for a number of players," Bailey said.

"Cam is one of those. Marcus Harris, who's been on a number of tours as spare better. 

"Cam's Sheffield Shield record over the last couple of years has obviously been phenomenal and it's made this decision really challenging. Line-ball call. 

"Ultimately, the decision to get Cam (Green) into the team was around we want our best six batters playing. 

"And as it currently stands, the panel sees Matt Renshaw as our next best batsman."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.