Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Nottingham Post
Nottingham Post
World
Twm Owen Local Democracy Reporter & Annette Belcher

Neighbours' row with homeowner over garage being '50cm too high'

Neighbours have lost a battle with a homeowner to reduce the height of a garage. Steve Bull was given permission in 2019 to build a garage that should have been four metres from its ridge height.

But it was built 1.2 metres taller than its approved plans. As a result, its roof had to be reduced by 76 cm after Mr Bulls' appeal to keep the taller height failed.

Now it still remains half a metre, or 50cm, taller than originally intended. This meant Mr Bull has had to submit a new planning application to keep the structure in Old Barn Way, Abergavenny, still slightly higher than it should be.

The new planning application to retain and complete the garage came back before a Wales council’s planning committee, following a request from local councillor Martyn Groucutt, who covers the Abergavenny area.

He told the committee: “All the neighbours oppose (the application) except for the resident of number 60. She is a tenant and the applicant doesn’t live at the house.”

The Labour councillor said “much has been said about the height” but he said the “footprint” of the garage should also be considered.

Another local councillor, Maureen Powell said: "Had this gentleman gone along with what was approved at the very start we would not have this problem now.”

She said the building would "stand out like a sore thumb” and said the originally approved four-metre height, should remain.

Jan Butler, also a local councillor, added: “This is very much an over development and completely out of scale and character and I just feel I can’t support it.”

But planning officers said the 0.5m increase on what was originally approved is "relatively small” and the height is “acceptable in this urban context”.

The report to the committee said: “It is difficult to justify why that would be acceptable but a marginally higher structure would not be in this context where many other outbuildings have been constructed to the rear of existing dwellings.”

The report also said the garage, at the size now agreed, would be "largely screened” by a neighbouring garage so it is not considered to be over bearing. The application was approved.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.