Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Evening Standard
Evening Standard
Politics
Georgia Bell

More than 70 asylum seekers to be awarded compensation after their phones were seized

The former government’s ‘blanket’ approach to confiscating phones has been deemed unlawful - (PA Wire)

The government will compensate more than 70 asylum seekers whose mobile phones were unlawfully taken upon arrival in Britain, the High Court has ruled.

The ruling found that the Home Office acted unlawfully when it confiscated mobiles and SIM cards from asylum seekers crossing the channel in 2020, many of whom were held for three months or longer, and some were never returned.

High Court judges ruled that the former government’s “blanket” seizure policy breached the European Convention on Human Rights, which laid new groundwork for costly compensation claims.

The Home Office has already approved payouts for 32 people, which have amounted to £210,800.

A further 41 cases remain outstanding and amount to a bill totalling £480,887, the Mail reported.

The Home Office, led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, must 'use all reasonable endeavours' to contact those affected (PA Wire)

The Home Office has already spent £735,000 contesting the case, the Sun reported.

This follows a judicial review launched in November 2020 by three asylum seekers, which found that nearly 2,000 phones were confiscated by the government between April and November 2020.

All seized devices and SIM cards were subjected to full data downloads until 2020.

From that point, downloads were limited to instances in which a “person of interest” had been identified on a boat.

In January 2022, the case arrived at the High Court, and the ruling was given two months later.

According to Lord Justice Edis, the former Home Secretary Priti Patel recognised that the “blanket seizure policy... was not in accordance with the law”.

Former Home Secretary Priti Patel (PA Archive)

The ruling found that phones and PINs were taken “ without any lawful authority”, and their confiscation restricted the asylum seekers’ rights to family and private life, thereby breaching the ECHR.

The judges ruled in October 2022 that: “The Mobile Phone Policy was unlawful because it was unpublished.”

They added: “Searches and/or seizures were unlawful because they operated in a blanket way.”

The court also highlighted a “failure of governance” surrounding the unpublished policy.

During proceedings, evidence was given to support claims that asylum seekers were “bullied” into disclosing passcodes, allowing personal data to be obtained and added to an intelligence system, known as Project Sunshine.

The court was ordered by the Home Office to “use all reasonable endeavours” to contact asylum seekers whose phones had been confiscated and to advise them: “If you have not taken legal advice on your position, you are strongly advised to do so now.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.