During a recent court proceeding, Michael Cohen, former attorney to President Donald Trump, was questioned about American Media Inc. (AMI), the publisher of the 'National Enquirer,' and its alleged practice of 'catch and kill.'
Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger inquired whether Cohen was aware of AMI ever paying to suppress stories before Trump announced his presidential run. Cohen responded with a straightforward 'No, ma'am.'
The term 'catch and kill' refers to a practice where a media outlet buys the rights to a story with the intention of never publishing it, effectively burying potentially damaging information. This tactic has been a subject of controversy in the media industry, with critics arguing that it can be used to protect powerful individuals from negative publicity.
AMI, known for its tabloid publications, has faced scrutiny over its relationship with Trump and its role in suppressing stories that could be detrimental to his image. The company's involvement in such practices has raised questions about journalistic ethics and the extent to which media organizations are willing to go to protect their interests.
Cohen's testimony sheds light on the inner workings of the media landscape and the intricate relationships between powerful figures and media outlets. The revelation that he was not aware of AMI paying to suppress stories prior to Trump's presidential bid adds another layer to the ongoing saga surrounding the president and his associates.
As the legal proceedings continue, more details may emerge about the practices of AMI and its impact on the media landscape. The intersection of politics, media, and power dynamics remains a complex and evolving area of interest, with implications for transparency and accountability in the public sphere.
