Max Homa has offered a strong defence to the PGA Tour 's decision to introduce a number of limited-field, no-cut events to its season calendar for 2024.
The PGA Tour's changes have been likened to their rivals at LIV Golf, who have prided themselves on offering no halfway-point cut, allowing all 48 players in their fields to take home a cut of the purse. Following LIV's formation last summer, those on the side of the PGA were quick to criticise this, labelling the events 'exhibitions'.
Just months on though, the American-based circuit have announced a number of similar tournaments will be added to their campaign schedule next year, under the umbrella of their newly introduced 'elevated events'.
The changes have not been well received by many, with critics calling out a feeling of hypocrisy following its similarities to LIV Golf. One of the Tour's top stars, Homa however has backed the plans, and hit back at those who claim the circuit's interests are solely money-driven.
Ahead of this week's Arnold Palmer Invitational, he said: "I love the new changes. The product is important. I think it's easy to frame these changes as a way to put more money in the top players' pockets. But it has been made to make it easier and more fun for the fans.
"I know it's low-hanging fruit to jump on, Oh, this is just a money grab. This is to make it better for the fans. It is a guarantee on who will be at events and leaning more on the more there. It is more opportunity for the top players to battle it out late on Sunday.
"Which, you look back at times of Phil and Tiger, the two best players growing up for me watching, and they had like maybe two real battles. So we're going to have more of that."
Another key criticism has been the new schedule plans limit the playing opportunities of the lower-ranked players do to the reduced-fields.
Homa - who has competed at both ends of the spectrum throughout his career - believes this is not the case. "The non-designated events are the same purses with, on paper, weaker fields." Homa added. "There's a lot of room for growth throughout that. You can play your way into the designated events.
What do you make of the PGA Tour's changes? Let us know in the comments section below.
"The part that's frustrating and maybe just simply misunderstood is that if we made these fields very large in these designated events, it would ruin non-designated events. It would ruin them. No one would play in half of them because it would no longer fit your schedule.
"I think that the Tour's done a great job of looking into it. Seeing that [70-80] would be a great number to cut to make sure that we still have competitive events that are non-designated. Maybe not the top-50 big names, but big names [will be] keeping the sponsors and the fans happy with the parity. "
