If I ran the show at Manchester United, I would be making a big effort to keep Paul Pogba.
Top clubs need top players who can turn games, and Pogba still falls into that category.
Until recently, when United fans came on the radio to moan about a bad performance, it was always Pogba or Cristiano Ronaldo's fault.
At least, that's the perception – and it's ridiculous to heap the blame for a disappointing season on the top scorer and a World Cup winner who can still turn a game.
Every club has its scapegoats, but some are easier targets than others.
I can't understand how a player who cost £89 million has been allowed to run down his contract into the last four months where he can leave for nothing in June.
When France won the World Cup in 2018, Pogba looked one of the best players on the planet, so we know there's a fantastic talent there.
And it's a crying shame United have not been able to get the genie out of the bottle more often since he rejoined the club six years ago.
But surely they cannot allow a repeat of the nightmare scenario where Carlos Tevez walked out of Old Trafford, into Manchester City's waiting arms and became a title-winner at the Etihad.
Have Your Say! Should Man Utd break the bank to keep Paul Pogba? Tell us here.
Pogba was miffed to be thrown on as a half-time substitute against Liverpool, when United were already 4-0 down, and he was sent off within 15 minutes.
But he has recovered some of his mojo under interim manager Ralf Rangnick. After three months out with injury, he scored his first goal of the season at Burnley, provided his first assist since September against Brighton and it seems the supporters are warming to him again.
If United let him leave this summer, and he comes back to haunt them in another Premier League club's colours next year, they will regret it.