It is clear enough that the United States can bring suit under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. But can private litigants bring such a suit? Nothing in the text of the statute expressly grants that right. Does Section 2 include an implied private right of action? Recently, the Eighth Circuit held that it does not. However, in Robinson v. Ardoin (2023), a panel of the Fifth Circuit disagreed. Last month, the Louisiana Solicior General filed a petition for initial hearing en banc to resolve the split between the Eighth and Fifth Circuits. This petition would have skipped the three-judge panel, which was bound by the circuit precedent. The petition explained that initial en banc would "conserve" the Court's resources:
Panel-stage briefing on this threshold issue also would be pointless under the rule of orderliness. Appellants thus seek to advance judicial economy—as this Court has done—through "initial en banc hearing … without requiring the matter to percolate uselessly through a panel." Williams v. Catoe, 946 F.3d 278, 279 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc). And if the en banc Court rules in Appellants' favor, that dismissal on clean legal grounds would obviate the need for a panel to spend extraordinary time and resources reviewing the district court's 91-page opinion for alleged Section 2 violations across nearly 150 House and Senate districts.
The clerk informed the SG that he would not circulate the petition to the full en banc court until the merits of the appeal are fully briefed. The United States and the private plaintiffs filed an opposition. Under FRAP 35, oppositions to en banc petitions are only filed after a request from the court. But here, the clerk styled the petition as a "motion for hearing en banc," and the appellees could file an opposition brief.
