Scientific community sceptical of ‘magic material that would revolutionise our world’
The scientific community remains “deeply sceptical” over claims of a discovery of the world’s first superconductor able to operate at room temperature and under normal pressure.
- SEE MORE How can we get electricity from space?
- SEE MORE What is the quantum apocalypse?
- SEE MORE The latest nuclear fusion breakthrough explained
Since news of the LK-99 superconductor first broke at the end of July “this pebble-sized dark rock – made of lead, phosphorus, copper and oxygen – has pushed social media into meltdown, sent stock markets surging and put Silicon Valley investors into a spin”, said Anjana Ahuja in the Financial Times (FT).
What is LK-99?
Scientists in South Korea claim to have discovered a room-temperature superconductor that works at normal pressure.
The research team, led by Sukbae Lee and Ji-Hoon Kim from the start-up firm Quantum Energy Research Centre in Seoul, published their findings in two preprint papers last month. They claimed that a compound of copper, lead, phosphorus and oxygen – dubbed LK-99 – exhibits two key signs of superconductivity: zero electrical resistance and the Meissner effect, in which the material expels magnetic fields.
A video attached to one of the papers appeared to prove the sample’s magnetic properties by showing the stone-like material levitating, although many materials can exhibit similar behaviour.
While superconductors already exist, they currently only operate under extremely low temperatures or high pressures, making them “too difficult and expensive to use in most everyday applications”, said The Verge.
Why the buzz?
“If true, it represents colossal progress,” said the FT’s Ahuja. Scientists have spent decades searching for a substance that is superconducting under normal, day-to-day conditions, and finding one “would have a revolutionary impact on a wide range of industries”, said New York magazine.
It would “pave the way for perfectly efficient high-capacity power grids, desktop quantum computing, fusion reactors and even levitating trains”, said the FT.
Today might have seen the biggest physics discovery of my lifetime. I don't think people fully grasp the implications of an ambient temperature / pressure superconductor. Here's how it could totally change our lives.
— Alex Kaplan (@alexkaplan0) July 26, 2023
Put bluntly, “this magical material could revolutionize our world”, claimed The Atlantic, not to mention providing fame and fortune for its inventors.
“A technologically viable room-temperature superconductor isn’t just Nobel Prize territory,” Chris Grovenor, professor of materials at the University of Oxford and director of the Centre for Applied Superconductivity, told The Verge. “If you’ve patented it, it’s incalculable value essentially.”
How has the scientific community reacted?
The discovery has “prompted a slew of replication efforts by scientists and amateurs alike”, reported Nature, “but initial efforts to experimentally and theoretically reproduce the buzzworthy result have come up short, and researchers remain deeply sceptical”.
There are several ways to test if something conducts electricity perfectly at room temperature and pressure, said New Scientist. However, “the flurry has yet to find much scientific consensus. Creating pure samples of LK-99 in the lab and determining their quality is also proving difficult,” said the magazine. Two separate experimental efforts by teams at the National Physical Laboratory of India in New Delhi and Beihang University in Beijing reported synthesising LK-99, but did not observe signs of superconductivity.
Most reports carry the big caveat that both papers have not yet been peer-reviewed, while The Verge sets out a series of “red (or at least yellow) flags” such as inconsistencies in the data, conflict between authors, and how LK-99 was constructed.
It would not be the first time scientists have fallen for such claims. Back in 2020, a team of researchers from the University of Rochester announced they had found a room-temperature superconductor made from hydrogen, sulphur and carbon. But the research, published in the respected journal Nature, was later retracted after editors pointed to issues with how the study’s data was processed.
Whatever properties LK-99 turns out to possess, said New York magazine, “its story so far is a reminder of why science is normally done in a slow, laborious way, with researchers carefully checking their work and running it by peers before unveiling it to the general public”.
Given superconductivity’s history of false dawns, LK-99 “is most likely to be an unremarkable rock with accidentally interesting properties”, agreed Ahuja in the FT. “But what a gripping spectacle – one that tells us less about physics and more about the collective human need, even among scientists and investors, to dream.”
