England's poorest councils - including Liverpool and Knowsley - are still way behind the wealthiest local authorities in spending power despite the government's claims around Levelling Up.
New analysis shows that the money available to English councils in the poorest areas of the country, which receive less revenue from the local levy due to lower property prices and housing growth, is still significantly lagging behind after long-running reductions in direct government grants.
The research, by LG Improve and shared with the Press Association, used official figures and examined annual changes in spending power – the Government’s preferred measure of council funding as it includes council tax, business rates and core grants – for all top-tier councils since the dawn of austerity in 2011-12.
READ MORE: Barmaid may need plastic surgery after drinker 'exploded' her nose
Together, the current five poorest upper-tier council areas, which are all in the North of England (Blackpool, Knowsley, Liverpool, Kingston upon Hull, and Middlesbrough), will have experienced an average 7% increase in spending power by 2023-24.
In the same timeframe, the five least deprived areas based on indices of multiple deprivation (West Berkshire, Richmond upon Thames, Rutland, Windsor & Maidenhead, and Wokingham) have seen a 24% increase.
The spending power of Knowsley Council, identified as having the highest needs of all local authorities in 2011-12, will have increased by 6% by 2023-24. But Wokingham Borough Council, the wealthiest local authority area, will have seen a 43% rise.
Highlighting the uneven impact of council tax on spending power levels, Knowsley has seen a 30% increase in the revenue it can collect through the levy over the period, compared with a 72% rise in Wokingham.
This pattern of spending power growth since the beginning of austerity can also be observed at a broader regional level. Collectively, upper-tier councils in the South East of England have experienced an average rise in spending power of 21%, while the increase in the North West will be 15%. The 2023-24 local government finance settlement represented a 9.4% annual increase in spending power for councils in England overall, assuming they all raise council tax to the maximum permitted without a referendum.
Announcing the settlement, Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove said it shows the Government “continues to stand behind councils." He added: “Local government plays a vital role in helping us to level up, support the most vulnerable, and deliver key services that people rely on every single day."
But LG Improve financial resilience director Dan Bates said his analysis shows the "frailty of a system more reliant on local taxpayers to fund services". He added: "In reality, additional funding and a much fairer approach to resource distribution is needed if the Government is to deliver any meaningful levelling-up agenda."
The Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities (Sigoma), which represents metropolitan and unitary authorities outside London, said the ongoing disparities in spending power go "to the very heart of the levelling-up agenda".
Sigoma chairman and Labour leader of Barnsley Council Sir Stephen Houghton said that, as well as the impact of a reliance on council tax to fund services, the current business rates system also rewards high-growth councils and creates an "ever-growing gap" between the poorest and wealthiest areas.
He added: "How can you level up when the poorest areas are seeing the biggest cuts to local services? The consequences of these cuts on the poorest areas have been dire. Reduced local spending has harmed economic growth and prosperity."
The government's recent Levelling Up awards proved controversial once again as Rishi Sunak's wealthy Richmond constituency received nearly £20 million, while deprived areas like Huyton in Knowsley saw bids rejected again.
Speaking after that announcement, Liverpool City Region Mayor Steve Rotheram said: "Levelling Up funding is supposed to go to areas that have been left behind and need to Level Up. But because there is an opaque nature to the methodology used to make these decisions, areas that have been identified as being high priorities - like Huyton in Knowsley - have got no pounds and no pence from a total of four bids they have made in two rounds.
"Now if it's a bad bid then you could understand that, but the government have said it was a good bid. But in comparison to what's happened in Huyton and look at the former Chancellor's (Javid) constituency, they got £147 per person and the current Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak's constituency has just been given £19 million. Huyton put a bid in again and got rejected - that can't possibly be levelling up."
The LG analysis traced the root causes of the resource disparities by examining the impact of decisions by successive governments over the last 12 years. The coalition government's first local government financial settlement in 2011-12 followed a decision to stop using formulae driven by levels of poverty to ensure councils with high needs and lower council tax revenues received more funding.
Direct government funding also reduced by a similar percentage for all councils at the time, meaning those most reliant on grants to meet greater demand for services were hit hardest. Consequently, Knowsley had experienced a 25% decrease in its spending power by 2016-17.
In contrast, Wokingham - with a similar population size and overall volume of homes to Knowsley - experienced a reduction in spending power of just 1% over the period. This equates to a loss of £263 per head in Knowsley, compared with £50 in Wokingham.
A form of "equalisation" was introduced by the government in 2016-17 to help address the variation in council tax revenues, but this had minimal impact on resource disparities, the analysis found.
The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities has been contacted for comment.
READ NEXT:
Barmaid may need plastic surgery after drinker 'exploded' her nose
Coca Cola warning to anyone who buys any of its products
15 things you could do in 70s Liverpool that you can't do now
