In the world of filmmaking, it's not uncommon for movies to receive mixed reactions from audiences, with differing perspectives and interpretations. This is particularly true when it comes to subjects that touch upon sensitive topics, such as historical events and the portrayal of marginalized communities. Such is the case with the highly anticipated film Killers of the Flower Moon, directed by Martin Scorsese.
Recently, there was a notable exchange of views between two indigenous actresses involved in the project: Lily Gladstone, who plays Mollie Burkhart, and Devery Jacobs, known for her role in Reservation Dogs. Jacobs expressed her criticism of the film, while simultaneously praising Gladstone's outstanding performance.
Gladstone, however, chose to respond in a respectful and understanding manner. In an interview with Rolling Stone, she emphasized her friendship with Jacobs and acknowledged that everyone's reaction is influenced by their unique experiences and traumas. She did not want to put heat on Jacobs for expressing her views, recognizing the validity of her response. Gladstone emphasized that the most significant factor for her was the reaction of the Osage people, the community affected by the events depicted in the film.
The controversy surrounding Killers of the Flower Moon stems from its portrayal of violence against indigenous women. Jacobs raised concerns about the potential normalization of such violence and the further dehumanization of Native people as a result. It is essential to acknowledge the trauma that can arise for individuals who see their history and struggles depicted on the screen.
Gladstone is well aware of this potential impact. In November, she encouraged Native women and youth to approach the film with caution and only if they felt ready. Her responsible message was accompanied by a provision of mental health and support resources specifically targeted at Native individuals, particularly women. Her genuine care and concern exemplify her understanding of the potential ramifications of the film.
The differing reactions from Gladstone and Jacobs shed light on the complexities surrounding the ethical portrayal of historical events and marginalized communities in film. While the involvement and support of the Osage tribe during production provide a certain level of validation, it's crucial to respect and acknowledge the perspectives of those who may be retraumatized by such portrayals.
Ultimately, there is no right or wrong response to a film like Killers of the Flower Moon. It is a heavy and complex subject, and it is essential to allow room for discourse and differing opinions. The exchange between Gladstone and Jacobs highlights the need for respectful dialogue and emphasizes the importance of considering the impact that movies can have on individuals and communities.
Killers of the Flower Moon promises to be a thought-provoking film that delves into a dark chapter of American history. Based on the non-fiction book by David Grann, it explores the Osage tribe's murders in the 1920s following the discovery of oil on their land and the subsequent investigation by the newly established FBI.
As the release of Killers of the Flower Moon approaches, it's an opportunity for audiences to engage in conversations about the ethical responsibility of filmmakers when dealing with sensitive subjects. By listening to diverse perspectives, we can learn and grow, fostering a more inclusive and empathetic society.
