No ethics adviser. I’m sorry to mention this twice, I know it’s in that box directly above here. But seriously, no ethics adviser. I mean, come on.
It’s only to be expected really, I suppose. I think this paper wrote a while ago that Lord Geidt was considering his position. The sheer stress of it, trying to advise a walking ethical conundrum on what’s right and wrong. The overtime must have been ridiculous.
Labour should be all over this but, as discussed previously, seem oddly reticient to get stuck in.
