Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Kamala Harris Testimony Raises Concern Over Plagiarism

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House in Washington, U.S.

During a recent review of Kamala Harris' testimony in front of Congress in 2007, it was discovered that she had used language similar to that of a Republican attorney, raising concerns of plagiarism. The incident, first reported by the Washington Free Beacon, has sparked discussions among experts.

At the time of the testimony, Harris was serving as the district attorney of San Francisco. She appeared before the House Judiciary Committee to express support for the John R. Justice Prosecutors and Defenders Incentive Act of 2007, a bill aimed at creating a student loan repayment program for state and local prosecutors and public defenders.

The incident occurred during Harris' time as the district attorney of San Francisco.
Harris' 2007 testimony raised concerns of plagiarism due to similarities with a Republican attorney's.
Harris supported the John R. Justice Prosecutors and Defenders Incentive Act of 2007.

It was noted that portions of Harris' prepared testimony closely mirrored the prepared testimony of Paul Logli, a Republican state’s attorney from Illinois and chairman of the board of the National District Attorneys Association, who had testified before the Senate two months earlier. The similarities in language and content between the two testimonies have raised eyebrows.

During the time of the testimony, Harris was a member of the board of directors of the National District Attorneys Association, which may have influenced the similarities in the testimonies. Logli mentioned that the organization likely researched and drafted his opening statement, which could explain the overlap in language.

Logli further clarified that Harris, representing California state prosecutors as a board member of the NDAA, may have relied on the organization's staff support for her opening statement. The Harris campaign has not yet provided a comment on the matter.

While the incident has drawn attention and raised concerns, experts have noted that it may not constitute a serious case of plagiarism. The use of similar language in testimonies within the same organization and context could be attributed to standard practices of drafting and presenting statements.

As discussions continue regarding the similarities in testimonies, the focus remains on ensuring transparency and integrity in public testimonies and statements made by public officials.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.