Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
National
Andy Grimm

Judge sets sentencing dates for ComEd conspirators

Michael Madigan confidant Michael McClain (left) leaves the Dirksen Federal Courthouse after being found guilty on Tuesday. McClain and his three co-defendants are set to be sentenced in that case in January, just three months before McClain is set to go to trial alongside the former Illinois House Speaker. (Anthony Vazquez/Sun-Times)

About three months before he’s slated to go to trial on racketeering charges alongside former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, Madigan’s longtime confidant Michael McClain is set to be sentenced on bribery charges.

McClain and his co-defendants — former Commonwealth Edison CEO Anne Pramaggiore, retired ComEd executive John Hooker and former City Club of Chicago President Jay Doherty — were found guilty Tuesday in an elaborate scheme to influence Madigan that funneled $1.3 million in payments to the speaker’s political allies.

A federal judge on Friday set McClain to be the first among the ComEd defendants to be sentenced, on Jan. 11. Pramaggiore’s sentencing is scheduled for Jan. 16; Hooker, Jan. 25; and Doherty, Jan. 30.

The trial of Madigan and McClain, in a separate case that includes ComEd allegations as well as other alleged schemes, is scheduled to begin next April.

The defendants each face up to five years in prison on counts related to the conspiracy to bribe Madigan. Individual counts of bribery carry sentences up to 10 years, and charges related to falsifying records have a 20-year maximum sentence.

Sentencing dates often are delayed, and McClain would likely petition U.S. District Judge Harry D. Leinenweber to move McClain’s sentencing until the conclusion of the racketeering case.

While he didn’t face charges in the ComEd trial that ended this week, Madigan was a key character in the prosecution’s case.

Prosecutors and witnesses described Madigan’s near-total control of the state legislature, which ComEd hoped to leverage to get passed legislation that was favorable to the utility company’s bottom line.

To get to the speaker, ComEd essentially created a patronage job system inside the company, where people recommended by Madigan were hired to do little or no work. At trial, lawyers for the four defendants characterized the hiring as typical legal lobbying.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.