In a two-sentence footnote within a voluminous court opinion, a federal judge recently criticised immigration agents for using artificial intelligence to draft use-of-force reports, a practice that could foster inaccuracies and further erode public confidence in how law enforcement has managed the immigration crackdown in the Chicago area and subsequent protests.
U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis, in a 223-page opinion issued last week, highlighted that the use of ChatGPT for these reports undermines agents’ credibility and "may explain the inaccuracy of these reports."
