Summary
The government has confirmed it is making a significant new pay offer to NHS staff in England, including a one-off bonus, which unions say amounts to £2.5bn.
Rishi Sunak’s post-Brexit trade deal for Northern Ireland will face its first hurdle next week when MPs vote on a key part of the arrangement.
The Scottish National party is under increasing pressure to release its membership figures after two of the three candidates to replace Nicola Sturgeon as leader questioned the integrity of the ballot process, prompting accusations of “baseless smears” and “Trumpian” behaviour.
The president of the Law Society of England and Wales, Lubna Shuja, has said there is a “high chance” the government’s proposed illegal migration bill may not comply with international and domestic law.
Britain is to ban the Chinese-owned video-sharing app TikTok from ministers’ and civil servants’ mobile phones, bringing the UK in line with the US and the European Commission and reflecting deteriorating relations with Beijing.
MPs will vote on Rishi Sunak’s deal to revise the Northern Ireland protocol on Wednesdsay next week, Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the Commons, has announced.
Sinn Féin’s US fundraising arm has caused a row by calling for a referendum on Irish unity in adverts in the New York Times, Washington Post and other US publications.
Updated
Asked if he had been blocked by the Treasury from making a one-off payment offer before now, Steve Barclay, the health secretary, said decisions are taken “cross-government”.
He said: “My job is to make the case for the NHS within government.
“Of course that is something that I have been doing over recent months but we make these decisions collectively.
“I’m very pleased we’ve reached a settlement which the NHS staff council feel able to recommend to their members.”
Updated
Scrapping the tax-free cap on the lifetime pensions allowance could help to reduce the £3 billion spent per year on locum and agency staff in the NHS, the Chancellor said.
Jeremy Hunt, a former health secretary, told BBC Breakfast: “We looked at all the different options.
“The other options, if we had a scheme that was just for doctors, it would actually be more aggressive because what we’ve announced doesn’t help the very wealthiest doctors.
“It still keeps in a limit on the amount you can put in tax-free every year, but most importantly, it is something we can introduce in two weeks’ time and we can deal with a problem.
“The NHS at the moment spends about £3 billion a year paying for locum doctors and agency nurses because of these staffing shortfalls. This will help to reduce that, it will free up more resources.
“The British Medical Association, who you might imagine I’m not on their Christmas card list, has said this is potentially transformative for the NHS and it means doctors will not now leave the NHS because of the way pension taxes work, and I think that is a very important step forward.”
New pay offer made to NHS staff
The government has confirmed it is making a significant new pay offer to NHS staff in England, including a one-off bonus which unions say amounts to £2.5bn.
Unions involved in the pay talks said further strikes by ambulance staff and other NHS workers had been suspended and they would recommend members accept the new offer.
The government and the NHS staff council, which includes the unions, released a joint statement, which said: “Both sides believe [the offer] represents a fair and reasonable settlement that acknowledges the dedication of NHS staff, while acknowledging the wider economic pressures currently facing the UK.”
From the Guardian’s political editor
BREAKING: Government confirms that a pay offer has been reached with NHS unions - including a one-off deal for 2022/23 and a pay settlement for 2023/24.
— Pippa Crerar (@PippaCrerar) March 16, 2023
Updated
Rishi Sunak’s post-Brexit trade deal for Northern Ireland will face its first hurdle next week when MPs vote on a key part of the arrangement.
The full statutory instrument relating to the Stormont brake of the Windsor framework will be published on Monday before a vote in the Commons on Wednesday, the Commons leader, Penny Mordaunt, has confirmed. The mechanism will give the UK a veto over any new EU laws applying to trade in Northern Ireland.
It is not clear how the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) will vote, as the party previously said the framework did not deal with some “fundamental problems” created by existing arrangements. But the government hopes the mechanism will provide DUP MPs with enough reassurance.
Hardline Brexiters will be disappointed that they will not get a chance to vote on the Windsor framework in its entirety, but No 10 has said there will be more statutory instruments to be debated in the coming weeks.
Updated
The Scottish National party is under increasing pressure to release its membership figures after two of the three candidates to replace Nicola Sturgeon as leader questioned the integrity of the ballot process, prompting accusations of “baseless smears” and “Trumpian” behaviour.
The escalating row comes after the former junior minister and contest outlier Ash Regan called for greater transparency in how the leadership election was being run. In an open letter to the SNP chief executive officer, Peter Murrell, on Wednesday, written with the finance minister and fellow candidate Kate Forbes, the pair urged the party to release data on numbers of paid-up members, plus how many digital and postal ballots have been sent out to them.
Both candidates have also demanded an independent auditor be appointed to oversee the leadership vote.
Neil Gray, the minister running the campaign for the health secretary, Humza Yousaf, confirmed Yousaf had registered the same concerns with party managers.
Speaking to reporters after first minister’s questions on Thursday, Sturgeon told reporters she had “complete faith” in the process being used to elect her successor and insisted the membership figures would be published later on Thursday.
Updated
The president of the Law Society of England and Wales, Lubna Shuja, has said there is a “high chance” the government’s proposed illegal migration bill may not comply with international and domestic law.
The controversial bill provides the government with draconian new powers to restrict the rights of asylum seekers and trafficking victims.
Shuja has urged the UK government to reconsider its approach.
“It could lead to the British state violating fundamental rights, such as the right to life, to be protected from torture, trafficking and slavery, to liberty, to fair trial,” she said. “Tens of thousands of people would be detained indefinitely under these proposals, at great cost to the taxpayer, as there are not at this time safe third countries they could be removed to.”
Updated
The company behind the slimming jab Wegovy has been suspended from the UK’s pharmaceutical trade association after a row over sponsored weight-loss courses that promoted its medicines.
The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) said an extensive investigation by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) found Novo Nordisk to be in breach of the ABPI code of practice.
The ABPI said this included a clause relating to actions “likely to bring discredit on, or reduce confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry”.
Updated
The chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, has defended plans to increase duty on Scotch whisky, despite the industry saying the rise announced in the budget breaks a previous commitment made by the UK government.
PA Media reports:
Mark Kent, the chief executive of the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA), is demanding an urgent meeting with the chancellor to discuss the impact of the changes.
He called for the duty rise to be reversed, telling Hunt: “With the right support, with a reversal of the tax rise, we are confident the industry can continue to deliver for the UK economy.”
The secretary for Scotland, Alister Jack, is said to have conceded that the rise in alcohol duty was “not what I wanted for the Scottish industry”.
Jack is reported to have lobbied the chancellor against the increase, but said that “this time the lobbying hasn’t been successful”.
However Hunt insisted the government was keeping duty levels low.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme, the chancellor said: “We have been working very closely with the Scotch Whisky Association and we have frozen alcohol duty until August.”
The UK will then introduce “big reforms” to the alcohol duty system, which will mean duty is linked to the strength of the drink.
Hunt said this approach would be “beneficial to whisky distillers”, and added: “In real terms this means we will have the lowest level of duty for over 100 years, so we are keeping duty levels low.
“We will continue to engage with the industry and we want to do something that will mean they are successful and prosperous going forward.”
However in a letter to the chancellor, Kent complained about the impact the duty rise would have on “this iconic product”.
The SWA said the increase will mean taxes account for 75% of the cost of an average-priced bottle of Scotch – saying for a £15.22 bottle, £11.40 would go to HMRC through duty and VAT.
Kent told the chancellor: “The tax rise breaks the pledge made by the UK government to ‘ensure the tax system is supporting Scotch whisky’.
“This is a commitment the industry takes seriously and our member companies want to see it fulfilled.”
He said it will be the “largest duty rise since 1981”, and comes at a time when “the industry is facing significant domestic headwinds, including the soaring costs of energy”.
Kent also said a reduction in duty for drinks sold on draught would “increase the tax discrimination experienced by distillers” by “widening the gap” in tax between spirits and products such as beer and cider.
“This was a fundamental flaw in the duty reforms published by HM Treasury due to be implemented in August which we have repeatedly pointed out,” the SWA chief executive insisted.
He added that measures in the budget had compounded the problem and would mean “the new system will be a broken system, disadvantaging the Scotch whisky industry from the outset”.
The SNP MP Brendan O’Hara told the Commons: “Yesterday’s 10% increase in spirit duty is a disaster for the Scottish whisky and gin producers.”
He said the chancellor “has chosen a path which not only could destroy a hugely successful Scottish industry, but at the same time potentially kill the goose that has for so many years laid the Treasury’s golden egg”.
Updated
The UK government ignored scientific warnings from Natural England that its nature restoration target was inadequate and would not meet its commitments, documents show, undermining efforts to protect threatened species.
In December the environment secretary, Thérèse Coffey, unveiled targets at the biodiversity Cop15 in Canada to reverse the decline of nature in England. They included plans to improve the quality of marine protected areas, reduce pollution and nitrogen runoff in the river system, and restore more than half a million hectares of wildlife-rich habitat outside protected areas by 2042.
But documents obtained by Unearthed, Greenpeace’s investigative journalism unit, show that the government’s own adviser, Natural England, said ministers needed to agree a target of restoring 1.5m hectares of habitat outside existing protected sites, three times greater than the final target, if they wanted to meet a commitment to protect 30% of land and sea. They went on to suggest a minimum target of 750,000 hectares.
Updated
UK bans TikTok from government mobile phones
Britain is to ban the Chinese-owned video-sharing app TikTok from ministers’ and civil servants’ mobile phones, bringing the UK in line with the US and the European Commission and reflecting deteriorating relations with Beijing, my colleague Dan Sabbagh reports.
MPs to vote on Northern Ireland protocol deal on Wednesday next week, Mordaunt says
MPs will vote on Rishi Sunak’s deal to revise the Northern Ireland protocol on Wednesdsay next week, Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the Commons, has announced.
She told MPs at business questions:
On Wednesday March 22 a debate [will take place] on a motion to approve a statutory instrument relating to the Stormont brake in the Windsor framework.
At one point No 10 was wary of scheduling a vote on the deal because Sunak was nervous about a backlash against it from Brexiter Tories and the DUP. But the DUP has said it will take its time before coming to a considered view on the deal, and most Conservatives, including hardline Brexiters, have backed the agreement.
One Tory who has criticised it at length is the former PM Boris Johnson. But on Wednesday afternoon next week he will be otherwise engaged, giving evidence to the Commons privileges committee about the claims that he misled MPs about Partygate.
Updated
Tony Blair tells MPs resumption of power sharing would be best way for DUP to help preserve union
Tony Blair was in parliament today to talk to the Northern Ireland committee about the Good Friday agreement and the Windsor framework.
The questions from members of the committee were a mixture of fawning praise and attempts to settle old scores stemming from the Good Friday negotiations. But the most interesting parts were what he said about the current impasse in Belfast, where Stormont has been suspended for over a year .
Blair praised the government’s agreement with the EU to replace the Northern Ireland protocol with the Windsor framework, telling the committee that it is the best practical solution to the border issues that were caused by Brexit. He said:
My reason for supporting what the government has done, what this prime minister has done, on the Windsor agreement is I think it represents the most practical way forward that minimises all the theoretical objections.
He also urged the DUP, two of whose MPs were present, to rejoin power sharing.
If you want to preserve the union today, the best way of doing it is to recognise the status quo is the union, so make people comfortable with the status quo.
Then it was time to depart - but not before a quick stop to allow two members of the committee – the SDLP MP Claire Hanna and the Labour MP Mary Kelly Foy – to take selfies.
Updated
Health workers expected to be offered one-off payments worth up to 6% as part of revised pay offer
Steve Barclay, the health secretary, is expected to announce a formal pay offer to key unions involved in NHS strikes in England, including a one-off payment of up to 6% for this year, in an effort to end months of industrial action.
Last-minute talks between the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and the unions were understood to be continuing on Thursday morning, but an offer was expected to be made public later in the day.
Two sources suggested it would include an across-the-board payment of up to 6% for 2022-23, and then a permanent pay increase of about 5% for the coming financial year – significantly more than the 3.5% the Treasury had initially suggested was affordable. The payment for this year is expected to be split into two parts – a 2% one-off pay award, and a 4% “Covid recovery bonus”.
With inflation expected to fall sharply in the coming months, 5% is highly likely to amount to an above-inflation rise. Ministers had previously said they could not reopen the current year’s pay deal, under which many NHS workers received a flat-rate £1,400 increase.
The chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, said in his budget statement yesterday: “High inflation is the root cause of the strikes we have seen in recent months. We will continue to work hard to settle these disputes but only in a way that does not fuel inflation.”
Members of the unions involved, which represent ambulance workers and physiotherapists as well as nurses, would have to approve any offer in a consultation before the strikes could be permanently called off.
The Royal College of Nursing (RCN), which began historic strike action in December, was the first union to decide to suspend industrial action and enter “intensive” negotiations with the government last month. Other unions, including Unison, the GMB and Unite, whose members are part of the same bargaining unit as nurses – known as Agenda for Change – agreed to discussions a few days later. At the time, they were reassured any new offer would involve new money and not have to be funded from existing NHS resources.
The government hopes settling the NHS dispute will be the first step to resolving the waves of industrial action that have hit public services, including education and much of the civil service, from Border Force staff to driving instructors.
It is understood some of the final sticking points in the talks included whether the lowest paid would be given a more substantial uplift.
Some unions had been concerned that the government might try to do a separate deal with the RCN, breaking up the Agenda for Change bargaining unit – but Barclay’s offer is expected to apply to all the hundreds of thousands of workers covered.
Updated
Sinn Féin criticised after Irish unity adverts appear in US newspapers
Sinn Féin’s US fundraising arm has caused a row by calling for a referendum on Irish unity in adverts in the New York Times, Washington Post and other US publications.
The half-page ads were paid for by Friends of Sinn Féin and ran on Wednesday urging support for unity referendums in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. “It is time to agree on a date,” it said. “Let the people have their say.”
They coincided with the annual migration of political leaders from Ireland, north and south, to New York and Washington to network with US politicians while celebrating St Patrick’s Day.
The taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, expressed concern at the adverts coming at what he termed a “sensitive moment” in efforts to restore power sharing in Northern Ireland.
The Democratic Unionist party leader, Sir Jeffrey Donaldson, accused Sinn Féin of focusing on a “divisive border poll campaign” that will further polarise Northern Ireland.
The Sinn Féin leader, Mary Lou McDonald, played down the significance of the move. She told PA Media:
They’re ads from Irish American organisations whose view on reunification is well known and held for a very long time and they take out ads every year. So, the focus now needs to be on getting back to work [at Stormont].
Updated
Hunt is helping rich instead of helping people into work, says IFS
The IFS director, Paul Johnson, also said that abolishing the cap on tax-free pension savings “probably won’t play a big part, if any” in increasing the number of people in work, my colleague Richard Partington reports.
In his presentation, Johnson said:
One policy that probably won’t play a big part, if any, in increasing the number of people in work, is the increase in the pension tax annual and lifetime allowances. Even on OBR’s, in my view, optimistic assumptions, this will come in at £100,000 per job. There is a case for allowing people to save more in a pension, even if those who gain will generally be on high incomes up to £250,000 a year or more. While it was sensible to accompany this change with a limit on the size of the tax-free lump sum to 25% of the existing lifetime allowance, it was disappointing that other over-generous aspects of pension taxation – not least complete freedom from inheritance tax – were not reined in. The lack of any coherent strategy here remains deeply disappointing. Don’t forget, these changes are largely a rowing back on changes made just a few years ago by this government.
Updated
Households face 'continuing pain' with their finances, regardless of budget measures, IFS says
People are going to feel “continuing pain” with their finances regardless of the measures in yesterday’s budget, the Institute for Fiscal Studies says.
Paul Johnson, director of the IFS, delivered a bleak verdict in his opening presenation at the start of the IFS’s briefing on the budget. He said:
What households are going to feel over the next year will be continuing pain. Inflation may be coming down, but prices remain much higher than two years ago. Earnings haven’t caught up. The freezing of income tax and NICs [national insurance contributions] allowances and thresholds will cost most basic-rate taxpayers £500 next year and most higher-rate payers £1,000. The OBR may be relatively optimistic about the medium term, but it still thinks these will be the worst two years on record for household incomes. Its projections suggest that real household disposable incomes will be no higher in 2027 than they were in 2019, and barely higher than in 2017 – a lost decade for living standards.
Updated
Ambulance handover delays outside hospitals in England have risen to their highest level since the start of the year, PA Media reports. PA says:
About 28% of patients waited at least half an hour last week to be handed to A&E teams, up from 23% the previous week, according to NHS data.
Around one in eight (12%) patients waited over an hour, up from around one in 11 (9%).
These are the highest figures since the first week of January, when 36% of patients had to wait at least 30 minutes and 19% waited more than 60 minutes.
Updated
Government has made revised pay offer to health unions, reports say
The government has made a revised pay offer to unions representing nurses, ambulance staff and other health workers, Sky News is reporting. It says an announcement is expected this afternoon.
NHS unions receive new pay offer - announcement expected this afternoon https://t.co/oah0GagdRo
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 16, 2023
TikTok will be banned on government phones after security concerns were raised about use of the Chinese-owned app, PA Media reports. Oliver Dowden, the Cabinet Office minister, is expected to announce the move in a statement to MPs at lunchtime. PA says:
Security minister Tom Tugendhat had asked chiefs at the National Cyber Security Centre to review the video-sharing app.
Rishi Sunak has been under pressure from senior MPs to follow the US and EU in banning TikTok from government devices.
Earlier this week, he said the UK will “look at what our allies are doing”, with Washington and the European Commission already banning the social media platform from staff phones.
TikTok said bans had been based on “misplaced fears and seemingly driven by wider geopolitics”, saying it would be “disappointed by such a move” in the UK.
The move is also likely to anger Beijing, which has accused the US of spreading disinformation and suppressing TikTok amid reports the White House is calling for its Chinese owners to sell their stakes.
The UK’s science and technology secretary, Michelle Donelan, on Wednesday said the public can continue to use the app if they want.
“In terms of the general public, it is absolutely a personal choice. But because we have the strongest data protection laws in the world, we are confident that the public can continue to use it,” she told the Commons.
TikTok has long said it does not share data with China, but Chinese intelligence legislation requires firms to help the Communist party when requested.
Updated
Hunt claims it is 'bizarre' to describe budget as giveaway for rich
Here are some more lines from Jeremy Hunt’s morning interview round.
Hunt claimed it was “bizarre” to describe the budget as a giveaway for the rich in light of all the support going to people dealing with the cost of living crisis. Asked about this on Times Radio, he replied:
I think it is a rather bizarre thing to say that when this is a set of measures that means in two weeks’ time we are going to be spending a total of £94bn this year.
[It is] a huge amount of money: giving around £3,000 of cost-of-living support to a typical household, including uprating benefits with inflation, [and] one-off payments to people on low incomes of up to £900.
Yesterday the Treasury published a distributional impact analysis to go with the budget. It contained seven graphs, all of which showed measures benefiting the poorest households the most (making them progressive, by definition). But none of them analysed just the changes announced in yesterday’s budget; instead they included all measures from the autumn statement last year, all measures from the spending review of 2019, or the impact of the tax and benefit system as a whole.
Hunt claimed it was “impossible” to know how many doctors would return to work, or keep working, as a result of his abolition of the lifetime pensions allowance. He said he did not accept the estimate from the Office for Budget Responsibility that only 15,000 more people would stay in the labour force as a result. (See 9.01am.)
He accused Labour of hypocrisy on the lifetime pensions allowance, saying that last year Wes Streeting, the shadow health secretary, said removing the limit on the allowance for doctors would save lives. Hunt said:
[Streeting] seems to have changed his mind overnight on that one. He said it was crazy and it would save lives to get rid of that cap. Well, he was right in September when he said that.
Labour said today it would “encourage doctors to stay in work by creating a targeted scheme as the government has done for judges, rather than create free-for-all for the wealthy few”.
Hunt defended the decision to roll out the new free childcare policy for children aged one and two over several years, saying such a big reform had to be introduced over time. He told Sky News:
This is the biggest transformation in childcare in my lifetime.
It is a huge change and we are going to need thousands more nurseries, thousands more schools offering provision they don’t currently offer, thousands more childminders.
We are going as fast as we can to get the supply in the market to expand.
He rejected the claim that his decision in the budget to include construction workers on the shortage occupation list, which will make it easier for foreign construction workers to get visas to work in the UK, was a betrayal of people who voted for Brexit to reduce immigration. When this was put to him, he replied:
People who voted for Brexit didn’t vote for no immigration. They voted for control on migration …
But what those people who voted for Brexit want is an economy and economic model that does not depend on unlimited and unskilled migration. What those people want is to know that the government has a plan to remove the barriers that stop people working in the UK … That was the plan that I announced yesterday.
Updated
Hunt says he is 'hopeful' of reaching agreement with unions over pay for nurses and other NHS staff
As my colleagues Aubrey Allegretti and Denis Campbell report, ministers and health unions are on the verge of a breakthrough in talks to resolve their long-running pay dispute that has triggered a series of NHS strikes in England, with an announcement expected later today.
In his interview on the Today programme this morning, Jeremy Hunt said nothing to counter suggestions that a deal is imminent. He said:
We are having discussions, quite good discussions I think, with unions.
We’ve been very flexible about what we’ve been prepared to offer. The only condition we put on those talks is we can’t give an offer that would itself fuel inflation and mean we are having the same discussions this time next year.
Asked if the government would be offering health workers more money, he replied:
We don’t have an agreement yet, so I can’t tell you what the quantum is.
I am hopeful we will have an agreement. I think we’ve had some very positive discussions but let’s see where it ends up today.
But he did not rule out the government increasing the 3.5% pay rise proposed for health workers for 2023-24 in its submission to the pay review body. Asked if the government would offer more, he said:
All I will say is, if the government says we will do a different deal, we will find a way to pay for it. Yes, we would like to settle these disputes.
UK on track for ‘disastrous decade’ of income stagnation, says Resolution Foundation in budget analysis
The UK remains on track for a “disastrous decade” of stagnant incomes and high taxes, despite cuts to public services, the Resolution Foundation said in its analysis of the budget this morning. Here is the full report from the thinktank. And here is my colleague Phillip Inman’s story.
Updated
Jeremy Hunt defends pension tax giveaway for rich, saying it will lead to people getting NHS operations more quickly
Good morning. Liz Truss’s mini-budget self-destructed last year for many reasons, but the first element to get unpicked was the abolition of the 45p top rate of tax, a tax cut for the very rich. Labour is attacking Jeremy Hunt’s budget in the same manner, attacking his plan to abolish the pensions lifetime allowance (the limit on how much can be saved tax-free) as a tax cut for the very rich.
Last night, in an interview with ITV’s Peston show, Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, said Labour would try to block this with a vote in the Commons next week.
I think this could unravel as quickly as it began. If you remember last September, Liz Truss tried to cut the top rate of tax from 45p to 40p; everybody kicked off about it.
Next week there will be a vote on this, Labour will force a vote on this next week. And I would say to Conservative MPs in places like Ashfield, or Bolsover, or Stoke-On-Trent, whose side are you on? Are you on the side of ordinary working people in your constituencies who are seeing their taxes go up, or are you going to vote with Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt for a tax cut for the wealthiest in society?
This morning Labour said that, if it wins the next election, it will reverse Hunt’s move.
Reeves and Hunt have both been giving interviews this morning, and Hunt has defended the policy, saying it will benefit the NHS because it will stop senior doctors retiring early because the existing pension rules are a disincentive. He told the Today programme:
We have a particular problem in the NHS. We have large numbers of doctors who are reducing their hours or retiring early. The Royal College of Surgeons say that 69% of their members have reduced their hours because of the way pension taxes work. We have a big backlog in the NHS and all of us depend on the NHS.
We need to do everything we can. This is a measure that we can deliver quickly. The British Medical Association … say that this will mean that doctors do not leave the NHS because of pension tax rules. I think that’s very important.
The Office for Budget Responsibility said yesterday the policy would only lead to an extra 15,000 people staying in work. When this figure was put to Hunt, he said he did not accept it. He refused to give a figure for how many more doctors would stay in the workforce as a result of the pension allowance changes. But he said groups representing doctors insisted this would make a difference. He said:
We‘re spending £3bn a year in the NHS on locum doctors and agency nurses because of doctor shortfalls. If you ask doctors, they say this is one of the biggest reasons why consultants aren’t available.
If you’re asking what will have an impact on ordinary families up and down the country, it is getting their NHS operation done more quickly. And this is the simplest and quickest way to resolve that issue.
I will post more from the post-budget interviews this morning shortly.
Here is the agenda for the day.
9am: The Resolution Foundation holds a briefing to present its assessment of the budget.
9.30am: Tony Blair gives evidence to the Commons Northern Ireland affairs committee about the institutions set up by the Good Friday agreement.
10.30am: The Institute for Fiscal Studies holds its budget briefing.
11am: Keir Starmer is visiting a life science company in Edinburgh.
11.30am: MPs resume their debate on the budget.
I’ll try to monitor the comments below the line (BTL) but it is impossible to read them all. If you have a direct question, do include “Andrew” in it somewhere and I’m more likely to find it. I do try to answer questions, and if they are of general interest I will post the question and reply above the line (ATL), although I can’t promise to do this for everyone.
If you want to attract my attention quickly, it is probably better to use Twitter. I’m on @AndrewSparrow.
Alternatively, you can email me at andrew.sparrow@theguardian.com.
Updated
