Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Eugene Volokh

Injunction Against Further Leafletting by Union Organizer at CEO's Front Door

From Silva-Steele v. Enghouse, decided Thursday by the N.M. Court of Appeals, Judge Jennifer Attrep, joined by Judges Megan Duffy and Katherine Wray:

Defendant Adrienne Enghouse appeals a district court order permanently enjoining her from entering Plaintiff Jamie Silva-Steele's private, residential property. Silva-Steele initiated this case after Enghouse left a flyer, related to unionization efforts, at Silva-Steele's residence….

Before the incident giving rise to the injunction, Enghouse was attempting to unionize the employees of a hospital at which Silva-Steele serves as president and CEO. As part of her organizing activities, Enghouse leafleted Silva-Steele's neighborhood with informational flyers, leaving one at Silva-Steele's front door. {There does not appear to be any dispute that, because Silva-Steele's property was unposted at that time, Enghouse did not trespass on Silva-Steele's property when she left the flyer. The next day, however, Silva-Steele posted non-solicitation signs at her residence.}

In response, Silva-Steele filed a verified application for a restraining order in district court. Silva-Steele alleged in the application that Enghouse had "crossed the line by showing up at [her] house, and leaving … propaganda behind," causing her to "fear for [her] safety and the safety of [her] family." In relevant part, Silva-Steele asked the district court to order Enghouse to stay away from her home….

[At a hearing, c]ounsel for Enghouse admitted that Enghouse would be committing criminal trespass if she reentered Silva-Steele's property. Nevertheless, Enghouse, through counsel, refused to agree not to enter Silva-Steele's property in the future. After the hearing, the district court … found, "Enghouse … refused to acknowledge that the criminal trespass laws prohibit her from entering … Silva-Steele's property and testified that she intended to return to the property in the future." The court concluded, "Immediate and irreparable harm will result from … Enghouse's actions unless she is permanently restrained and enjoined from entering … Silva-Steele's private residential property." The district court thus permanently enjoined "Enghouse from entering the private property of … Silva-Steele for any purpose." …

The court concluded an injunction was authorized, despite the New Mexico Anti-Injunction Act:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.