
The mere existence of a $150 vacuum begs the question: do we need to be spending hundreds of dollars on a vacuum cleaner?
Dyson's vacuums are notoriously expensive, with high-tech features such as debris detecting green lights to help you spot hidden mess you'd otherwise miss. Dyson has a well-earned reputation of being the best, so can a cheaper vacuum with a similar feature live up to the hype at a fraction of the cost?