Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
GOBankingRates
GOBankingRates
Laura Beck

I Asked ChatGPT What Retiring at 62 vs. 67 Really Costs: The Answer Is Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars

sturti / Getty Images

Retiring five years early sounds like a dream. But according to ChatGPT, it could cost you a quarter-million dollars.

Read Next: This Is the Age Most Current Retirees Started Collecting Social Security 

Check Out: 7 Clever Ways Retirees Are Earning Up To $1K per Month From Home 

GOBankingRates asked the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot to break down the real financial difference between claiming Social Security at 62 versus 67, and the numbers are eye-opening.

The Monthly Gap

Claiming Social Security at 62 permanently reduces your benefit by about 30% compared with waiting until your full retirement age of 67. ChatGPT used a straightforward example to show what that looks like in practice: a $1,400 monthly benefit at 62 versus $2,000 at 67.

That $600 monthly difference adds up to $7,200 a year. Over a decade, that’s $72,000 gone.

Keep Financial Literacy Month going — learn how the MoneyLion app helps you track, manage and move your money in one place 

The Lifetime Number

The real damage shows up over a long retirement. ChatGPT calculated that for someone who lives into their mid-to-late 80s, waiting until 67 to claim can mean $100,000 to $250,000 more in total lifetime income. Claiming early means collecting longer, but the smaller checks never catch up.

The break-even point, the age at which waiting starts paying off, lands around 78 to 80. Live past that, and delaying almost always wins financially.

What You’re Actually Deciding

ChatGPT framed this as less of a math problem and more of a personal calculation. Claiming at 62 makes sense if you need income right away, have health concerns or don’t expect a long retirement. Waiting until 67 makes more sense if you’re in good health, want higher guaranteed income or want to protect a spouse.

That last point matters more than most people realize. For married couples, the higher earner’s benefit determines what the surviving spouse collects later. Delaying that benefit can mean significantly larger checks for a widow or widower decades down the road.

The Hidden Costs Most People Miss

Beyond the monthly reduction, ChatGPT pointed out two less obvious penalties for claiming early.

First, your annual cost-of-living adjustments are calculated on a lower base amount, so every raise you get over time is smaller than it would have been. Second, if you claim at 62 but keep working, your benefit can be temporarily reduced even further until you reach full retirement age.

The Simple Rule

ChatGPT kept the takeaway clean: If you expect a shorter retirement, you can consider claiming early. If you expect a long one, it may be best to delay. For most people in average or above-average health, waiting until 67 or even 70 produces significantly more money over a lifetime.

Retiring at 62 feels like a win on day one. For many retirees, it could end up being one of the most expensive decisions they ever make.

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: I Asked ChatGPT What Retiring at 62 vs. 67 Really Costs: The Answer Is Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.