Former Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker recently weighed in on the ongoing legal issues surrounding Hunter Biden and former President Donald Trump. Speaking from Des Moines, Iowa, Whitaker expressed his doubts about the likelihood of Hunter Biden facing legal consequences for any potential contempt charges. He noted that while Merrick Garland's Department of Justice (DOJ) had prosecuted individuals like Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro for contempt of Congress, they did not do the same for others like Mark Meadows. Whitaker speculated that Garland would likely take a categorically non-interventionist stance on Hunter Biden's case, given the more significant charges the latter is facing.
Turning to Hunter Biden's recent legal troubles, Whitaker commented on the plea deal that fell apart. The former Attorney General criticized the decision to allow the statute of limitations to expire on the most substantial charges related to his income from Burisma. Whitaker stressed that Hunter Biden now faces six felonies, including gun and tax charges. However, he opined that these charges may not be the most pressing concerns for the President's son, considering the other legal issues he faces.
When asked about the path forward for Hunter Biden, Whitaker admitted uncertainty regarding how the DOJ would handle the situation and whether Hunter Biden would face jail time. He suggested that Hunter Biden might be hoping for executive clemency from his father after the November elections. Whitaker also implied that delaying the legal proceedings and avoiding serious jail time would be the aim of Hunter Biden's defense team.
Discussing the ongoing investigation into potential benefits received by President Joe Biden as a result of Hunter Biden's business activities, Whitaker acknowledged that substantial evidence had been gathered. He mentioned the existence of LLCs that had seemingly facilitated financial transfers benefiting individuals connected to the Biden family. However, Whitaker emphasized that testimonies from Hunter Biden, James Biden (the President's brother), and others were necessary for a complete understanding of the situation.
Shifting the discussion to former President Donald Trump, Whitaker echoed Trump's claims that the litigation against him was politically motivated. He criticized the prosecution's use of novel legal theories and their timing, suggesting that the cases should be delayed until after the election to avoid interference. Whitaker also mentioned the ongoing case in Washington, D.C., which is currently delayed due to an appeal concerning immunity. He noted Trump's tireless efforts in both his legal battles and campaigning. Whitaker highlighted the challenges Trump faces in winning in Iowa, securing the nomination, and ultimately prevailing in the general election despite ongoing attempts to impede his campaign.
In conclusion, Whitaker provided insights into the legal situations surrounding Hunter Biden and former President Donald Trump. His comments indicated skepticism about the potential consequences for Hunter Biden's contempt charges and speculated on the possibility of executive clemency. Whitaker also critiqued the timing and motivations behind the litigation against Trump, characterizing it as politically motivated.
