Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Environment
Tin Fischer

How scientists debunked one of conservation’s most influential statistics

A Munduruku Indian female warrior carries a monkey on her head: scientists have concluded that while indigenous people do play essential roles in conserving biodiversity, there is little evidence for the claim they protect 80% of the world’s nature.
A Munduruku Indian female warrior carries a monkey on her head: scientists have concluded that while indigenous people do play essential roles in conserving biodiversity, there is little evidence for the claim they protect 80% of the world’s nature. Photograph: Lunae Parracho/Reuters

The statistic seemed to crop up everywhere. Versions were cited at UN negotiations, on protest banners, in 186 peer-reviewed scientific papers – even by the film-maker James Cameron, while promoting his Avatar films. Exact wording varied, but the claim was this: that 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity is protected by Indigenous peoples.

When scientists investigated its origins, however, they found nothing. In September, the scientific journal Nature reported that the much-cited claim was “a baseless statistic”, not supported by any real data, and could jeopardise the very Indigenous-led conservation efforts it was cited in support of. Indigenous communities play “essential roles” in conserving biodiversity, the comment says, but the 80% claim is simply “wrong” and risks undermining their credibility.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.