Transport for London’s claim that more than nine in 10 car drivers would be unaffected by the Ulez expansion could not be substantiated and was based on “impenetrable” data, the High Court was told on Tuesday.
It also relied on data from only 106 of its CCTV cameras in outer London to calculate the “compliance” figure - ignoring the evidence gathered from almost 1,500 of its cameras in central and inner London, the court was told.
