Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
Entertainment
Sian Cain

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child: is the shorter, one-part play better?

Paula Arundell, Michael Whalley, Gareth Reeves, Lucy Goleby and Lachlan Woods in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child at Melbourne's Princess Theatre.
Hermione (Paula Arundell), Ron (Michael Whalley), Harry (Gareth Reeves), Ginny (Lucy Goleby) and Draco (Lachlan Woods) in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child at Melbourne's Princess Theatre. Photograph: Michelle Grace Hunder

Let’s face it: if you’re up for watching an almost four-hour play about a middle-aged Harry Potter learning to be a good dad, you are probably fine with an almost six-hour version too. But Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the theatrical sequel to Rowling’s books, has now been tightened from a two-part play to a single three-and-a-half-hour show with an interval.

The new version – which opened in Melbourne last week, replacing the two-parter that began in Australia in 2019 – not only helps pack more audiences in, but it is likely to appeal to those with small children, smaller budgets (a ticket now costs between $60-$220, which is what you used to pay for each part), or people travelling to see it in the smattering of theatres putting it on around the world. The one-parter has also recently launched in San Francisco and on Broadway in New York, and will soon open in Toronto and Tokyo; the longer version will remain, for now, in London and Hamburg.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.