GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has announced her intention to force a vote over the ouster of House Speaker Mike Johnson next week. This move follows Democrats' vow to vote against the effort, ensuring Johnson retains his position.
Greene's decision concludes weeks of speculation and intensifies pressure on Johnson, setting the stage for a significant showdown on the House floor, despite expectations of the vote failing.
Johnson has stood firm against the threat, refusing to resign and cautioning that his removal could lead to chaos in the House. He labeled the motion as detrimental to the Republican Conference, the institution, and the country.
Many Republicans oppose Johnson's removal, fearing a repeat of the disarray that followed the historic ousting of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy last year.
Greene clarified that her actions are not a defiance of former President Donald Trump, despite his support for Johnson. She emphasized her dedication to Trump's agenda and her commitment to challenging her own party.
Regarding the possibility of repeated votes on the issue, Greene stated that she has not yet made a decision.
The motion to oust Johnson was initially filed in March amid conservative discontent over his handling of the government funding dispute.
House GOP leaders plan to swiftly reject Greene's motion, with the vote expected to take place next week. Democrats have pledged to help Johnson by voting to table the motion if it arises.
During a news conference, Greene criticized Johnson's support for Ukraine aid and denounced House Democrats for backing him. She accused Johnson of failing to align with the Republican agenda, prompting backlash from fellow Republicans.
Despite some Republicans expressing frustration with Johnson's performance, they disapproved of Greene's move, citing more pressing issues at hand.
Rep. Greg Pence emphasized the need to move forward and focus on important matters, highlighting the divisiveness of past speaker battles.
Greene's decision to push for Johnson's ouster sets the stage for a contentious debate in the House, with implications for party unity and legislative priorities.
