The ongoing conflict in Yemen and the recent airstrikes carried out by the United States have sparked concerns about the effectiveness of the strategy and the administration's approach to dealing with threats. Republican Congressman Michael Waltz, a combat decorated Green Beret and member of important committees, has criticized the White House's handling of the situation, stating that their appeasement and de-escalation strategy is actually inviting escalation.
Congressman Waltz expressed his frustration with the administration's half-hearted approach to addressing conflicts around the world, which he believes is leading to further escalation. He pointed out the decision to not designate the Houthis as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), opting for a less provocative measure instead. According to him, this weak response only serves to invite more aggression.
President Biden's recent statement regarding the strikes in Yemen has also drawn criticism. When asked if the airstrikes are working, the president replied that they are not stopping the Houthis and that they will continue. Congressman Waltz found this response infuriating, as it indicates that the administration's strategy is not effectively deterring the Houthis or other adversaries.
The congressman highlighted the recent attack by the Iranians targeting U.S. facilities, including our consulate and our Kurdish allies, as evidence that deterrence is falling apart. He expressed concerns that between now and November, adversaries will view this weak U.S. leadership as an opportunity to advance their own agendas. Congressman Waltz mentioned a statement by Chinese President Xi Jinping to Russian President Vladimir Putin, describing this moment as a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape the world due to the weak leadership of the United States.
The congressman also raised concerns about the overall effectiveness of the deterrence strategy employed by the U.S. military. He cited examples of deterrence being pushed back in various regions, including Ukraine and concerns about China. He noted that the adversaries have seemingly flipped deterrence against the U.S., with the administration appearing deterred by them instead.
In conclusion, Congressman Waltz's criticism of the White House's approach to the Yemen conflict and its broader strategy highlights concerns about the effectiveness of current policies and the implications for U.S. national security. The congressman argues that the weak response and lack of strong deterrence are inviting further aggression from adversaries around the world.
